How Does Hausdorff Distance Determine Equality of Compact Sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter diracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the Hausdorff distance between compact sets in Euclidean space, specifically focusing on continuity, boundedness, and the triangle inequality. The original poster presents a problem involving the Hausdorff distance defined for compact sets A and B in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) and seeks assistance with specific parts of the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity of the distance function and its implications for boundedness. Questions arise regarding how to demonstrate that the Hausdorff distance is finite and the conditions under which it equals zero. There is also an inquiry about proving the triangle inequality for the Hausdorff distance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach parts of the problem, particularly in showing boundedness for part (b) and exploring the triangle inequality. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify concepts and reasoning without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of typographical errors in the original problem statement that may affect clarity. The original poster expresses confusion specifically about parts (b) and (c) of the problem, suggesting a need for further exploration of these concepts.

diracy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a compact set A[itex]\subset[/itex][itex]\Re[/itex][itex]^{n}[/itex] and a point x[itex]\in[/itex][itex]\Re[/itex][itex]^{n}[/itex] define the distance from x to A as the quantity:

d(x, A)=inf({[itex]\left\|[/itex]x-y[itex]\right\|[/itex]: y[itex]\in[/itex]A})

Given two compact sets A, B [itex]\subset[/itex][itex]\Re[/itex][itex]^{n}[/itex], define the Hausdorff distance between them to be:

d(A, B)=max(sup{d(x, B) : x[itex]\in[/itex]A}, sup{d(x, A) : x[itex]\in[/itex]B})

a. For any compact set A, prove that the function f : [itex]\Re[/itex][itex]^{n}[/itex][itex]\rightarrow[/itex][itex]\Re[/itex] given by: f(x)=d(x, A) is continuous.

b. For any two compact sets A, B it's true that: d(A, B)<[itex]\infty[/itex]

c. For any two compact sets A, B it's true that d(A, B)=0 if and only if A=B.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I handled part a. I'm just completely lost on b and c. Any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The \left\ and \right\ should be norm.
 
Edited for a typo.
 
For (b), you need to show that

[tex]\sup_{x\in A}{d(x,B)}[/tex]

is bounded and equivalently that

[tex]\sup_{x\in B}{d(x,A)}[/tex]

is bounded. Now, can you use (a) to show this?
 
micromass said:
For (b), you need to show that

[tex]\sup_{x\in A}{d(x,B)}[/tex]

is bounded and equivalently that

[tex]\sup_{x\in B}{d(x,A)}[/tex]

is bounded. Now, can you use (a) to show this?

I got it! I really appreciate the help. I have one more question.

How do I show the following:

For any three compact sets: A, B, C we have a triangle inequality: d(A, C)[itex]\leq[/itex] d(A,B) + d(B, C)
 
Let

[tex]a(A,B)=\sup_{a\in A}{d(a,B)}[/tex]

(then [itex]d(A,B)=\max{a(A,B),a(B,A)}[/itex]).

Try to show first that

[tex]a(A,B)\leq a(A,C)+a(C,B)[/tex]

Thus, show the triangle inequality first for a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K