Locally compact and hausdorff proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForMyThunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let [tex]X[/tex] be a locally compact, Hausdorff topological space. If [tex]x[/tex] is an element of [tex]X[/tex] and [tex]U[/tex] is a neighborhood of [tex]x[/tex], find a compact neighborhood of [tex]x[/tex] contained in [tex]U[/tex].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Let [tex]N[/tex] be a compact neighborhood of [tex]x_[/tex]. The set [tex]D=Fr(N\cap\bar U)[/tex] is closed, hence compact. For each [tex]y\in D[/tex], there exist disjoint neighborhoods [tex]N_y[/tex] and [tex]N_y'[/tex] of [tex]y[/tex] and [tex]x[/tex], respectively. The set [tex]\{N_y:y\in D\}[/tex] is an open cover of [tex]D[/tex], hence it has a finite subcover [tex]\{N_{y_n}:y_n\in D\}[/tex]. The set [tex]\cap \bar N_{y_n}'}\subset N\cap U[/tex] is a closed neighborhood of [tex]x[/tex], hence it is compact.

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think so. The N'_y's are contained in U^0, and that every neighborhood of D is disjoint from the intersection of the N'_y's shows that their closure is also disjoint from it, and contained in U^0. Closed neighborhood contained in N => compact neighborhood.

This was my thinking, and its the part I'm worried about. If you've got any hints to an easier way...

^0 denotes interior.