How does Hawking radiation work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hawking radiation is a complex phenomenon that cannot be accurately described by simplistic models. Two common misconceptions involve particle-antiparticle pairs created near a black hole's event horizon, where one particle is absorbed and the other escapes. Both explanations fail to capture the intricacies of quantum field theory in curved spacetime. For a more accurate understanding, refer to the Usenet Physics FAQ and Stephen Hawking's original 1975 paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum field theory
  • General relativity
  • Black hole thermodynamics
  • Understanding of particle-antiparticle pairs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study quantum field theory in curved spacetime
  • Read Stephen Hawking's 1975 paper on black hole radiation
  • Explore black hole thermodynamics and entropy
  • Review advanced models of Hawking radiation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of black hole phenomena and quantum mechanics.

caspeerrr
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
When reading about this subject on the internet, I found two ways how it works and I don't know which one is correct.

1:
A particle pair is created near the black hole horizon. So there is an antiparticle and a particle. The antiparticle gets sucked into the black hole but because the antiparticle has a negative amount of energy, the total amount of energy inside the black hole will decrease. The particle will be sent away from the black hole as hawking radiation.

2:
A particle pair is created near the black hole horizon. To create this pair, energy of the gravitational pull of the black hole is used. The particle pair is entangled. One of the two will be sucked into the black hole while the other one will be sent away as hawking radiation. In conclusion, the black hole used the energy to create two particles and will only get the energy of one particle back. So, the total amount of energy will decrease and the black hole evaporates.

Which one is correct?
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
caspeerrr said:
I found two ways how it works and I don't know which one is correct.

Neither one is correct. They are both attempts to describe in ordinary language a process that involves some fairly advanced quantum field theory in curved spacetime (and even those advanced models aren't entirely satisfactory, which is why there are still open areas of research on this topic).

A decent quick summary of the limitations of these ordinary language descriptions, along with a somewhat better ordinary language description, is given in this Usenet Physics FAQ article:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/hawking.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: caspeerrr, Buzz Bloom and vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K