How does light show particle properties?

Click For Summary
Light exhibits both particle and wave properties, demonstrated through phenomena like the photoelectric effect and interference patterns. When light intensity is reduced, interference patterns emerge gradually, reinforcing the idea of light as quantized. The photoelectric effect shows that light can only emit electrons if its frequency exceeds a certain threshold, regardless of intensity. Additionally, experiments like the which-way and photon antibunching experiments provide strong evidence for light's particle nature, indicating that energy is delivered in discrete packets. This duality highlights the complexity of light's behavior in different contexts.
markoX
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

There is some things which i can't digest it.In light(gamma or X-ray) detectors we just get tick...tick..tick...tick from detectors,But In the light interference we see pattern(which it is continuous).Wow...how is it possible if you consider same light source for two case!
What hapends for light which show to different behavior?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
markoX said:
But In the light interference we see pattern(which it is continuous).
Crank down the intensity and you'll see that "continuous" pattern being built up tick by tick.
 
Also consider the "photo-electric" effect. Shining a low intensity light on a photo-electric cell will give no effect at all until, as you increase the intensity, a certain threshold of intensity is reached. A then no increase in the current until you hit twice that that intensity, etc. The intensities required depend upon the wavelength of the light. I believe that was, historically, the first indication that light came in "quanta".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Also consider the "photo-electric" effect. Shining a low intensity light on a photo-electric cell will give no effect at all until, as you increase the intensity, a certain threshold of intensity is reached. A then no increase in the current until you hit twice that that intensity, etc.
I wouldn't put it that way. If the frequency of the light is below the needed threshold, you can increase the intensity all you want and still get nothing. And if the frequency is above the threshold, even a low intensity light will produce photoelectrons.

Nonetheless, you are correct that the photoelectric effect is another demonstration of light's particulate nature.
 
Thanks for your replies.So are you saying me in fact light has particle nature which it shows wave behaviors classically (in large scale)?
 
Er... this post may be relevant with regards to the "particle" properties and the photoelectric effect:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1891152&postcount=6

I would say that there are two extremely strong type of evidence for the "particle" nature of light: the which-way experiment, and the photon antibunching experiment.

Unlike the standard, naive photoelectric effect, there are no classical, SED-type attempt at describing those two phenomena.

We also must be very careful in clarifying that the "particle" of light that we are talking about here has nothing to do with the classical particle, where a particle has definite spatial boundary, etc. The particle of light here only implies that the energy comes in discrete amounts and not divisible. So at a beamsplitter, it has to choose to go one way, or the other, but not both, thus, a which-way situation.

Zz.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K