How does light show particle properties?

In summary, the conversation discusses the behavior of light in different experiments, specifically in light interference and in light detectors. It is observed that in light interference, a continuous pattern is seen, while in light detectors, a ticking pattern is observed. The conversation then delves into the concept of light as both a wave and a particle, with evidence from the photoelectric effect and experiments such as the which-way experiment and the photon antibunching experiment. It is clarified that the "particle" nature of light refers to its energy being discrete and indivisible, rather than having a definite spatial boundary.
  • #1
markoX
28
0
Hi everybody,

There is some things which i can't digest it.In light(gamma or X-ray) detectors we just get tick...tick..tick...tick from detectors,But In the light interference we see pattern(which it is continuous).Wow...how is it possible if you consider same light source for two case!
What hapends for light which show to different behavior?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
markoX said:
But In the light interference we see pattern(which it is continuous).
Crank down the intensity and you'll see that "continuous" pattern being built up tick by tick.
 
  • #3
Also consider the "photo-electric" effect. Shining a low intensity light on a photo-electric cell will give no effect at all until, as you increase the intensity, a certain threshold of intensity is reached. A then no increase in the current until you hit twice that that intensity, etc. The intensities required depend upon the wavelength of the light. I believe that was, historically, the first indication that light came in "quanta".
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
Also consider the "photo-electric" effect. Shining a low intensity light on a photo-electric cell will give no effect at all until, as you increase the intensity, a certain threshold of intensity is reached. A then no increase in the current until you hit twice that that intensity, etc.
I wouldn't put it that way. If the frequency of the light is below the needed threshold, you can increase the intensity all you want and still get nothing. And if the frequency is above the threshold, even a low intensity light will produce photoelectrons.

Nonetheless, you are correct that the photoelectric effect is another demonstration of light's particulate nature.
 
  • #5
Thanks for your replies.So are you saying me in fact light has particle nature which it shows wave behaviors classically (in large scale)?
 
  • #6
Er... this post may be relevant with regards to the "particle" properties and the photoelectric effect:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1891152&postcount=6

I would say that there are two extremely strong type of evidence for the "particle" nature of light: the which-way experiment, and the photon antibunching experiment.

Unlike the standard, naive photoelectric effect, there are no classical, SED-type attempt at describing those two phenomena.

We also must be very careful in clarifying that the "particle" of light that we are talking about here has nothing to do with the classical particle, where a particle has definite spatial boundary, etc. The particle of light here only implies that the energy comes in discrete amounts and not divisible. So at a beamsplitter, it has to choose to go one way, or the other, but not both, thus, a which-way situation.

Zz.
 

1. How can light have both wave and particle properties?

Light behaves like a wave in some situations and like a particle in others. This is known as the wave-particle duality of light. It is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics and is supported by numerous experiments. Essentially, light is made up of photons, which can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior depending on how they are observed.

2. What evidence supports the particle properties of light?

The photoelectric effect is one of the main pieces of evidence that supports the particle properties of light. This phenomenon occurs when light is shone on certain materials, causing them to emit electrons. The amount of energy of these electrons depends on the frequency of the light, rather than its intensity, which is consistent with the particle nature of light.

3. Why do we use the term "particle" to describe light?

The term "particle" is used to describe light because light exhibits some of the characteristics of particles, such as having a specific energy and momentum, and interacting with matter in discrete packets (photons). However, it is important to note that light is not a physical object with mass, but rather a form of energy.

4. Can light be described as both a wave and a particle at the same time?

According to quantum mechanics, light can exist as both a wave and a particle at the same time. This is known as the wave-particle duality, and it is a fundamental aspect of the theory. However, the behavior of light in a given situation can only be described by one of these two models, depending on how it is being observed.

5. How do the particle properties of light affect its speed?

The particle properties of light do not affect its speed. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light in a vacuum is constant, regardless of the observer's frame of reference. This means that light will always travel at the speed of approximately 299,792,458 meters per second, regardless of whether it is behaving like a wave or a particle.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
835
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
239
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
625
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
523
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
785
Back
Top