How Does Modifying Parameters Affect Convolution and Fourier Transforms?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I know that the convolution of two functions [itex]f(x)[/itex] and [itex]g(x)[/itex] is given by

[tex] (f * g)(y) = \int_{\mathbb R} f(x)g(y-x) dx.[/tex]

But what if I'm trying to convolve a function [itex]f(x)[/itex] with a function [itex]g(x + az)[/itex], where [itex]a[/itex] is some constant? Is it just

[tex] (f*g)(y) = \int_{\mathbb R} f(x)g(y - x + az) dx.[/tex]

If so, why? I can't seem to find a definition of the convolution that makes this obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Convolutions are symmetric in f and g:

$$(f \star g)(y) = (g \star f)(y);$$

you could thus write the convolution of f(x) and g(x + az) as

$$\int_{\mathbb{R}} dx~f(y-x)g(x+az),$$

which is perhaps easier to see.
 
Okay, let me see if I can be more specific. What I'm really trying to do is to take the Fourier transform...in the [itex]x[/itex] variable...of the product [itex]f(x) g(ax + y)[/itex], where [itex]x,y\in \mathbb R[/itex] are independent (hence unrelated) variables. So I'm interested in

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-i p x} f(x) \cdot g(ax + y) \ dx.[/tex]

I know that Fourier transforms turn products into convolutions...but is it that straightforward in this case?
 
AxiomOfChoice said:
Okay, let me see if I can be more specific. What I'm really trying to do is to take the Fourier transform...in the [itex]x[/itex] variable...of the product [itex]f(x) g(ax + y)[/itex], where [itex]x,y\in \mathbb R[/itex] are independent (hence unrelated) variables. So I'm interested in

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-i p x} f(x) \cdot g(ax + y) \ dx.[/tex]

I know that Fourier transforms turn products into convolutions...but is it that straightforward in this case?

What you need is the opposite. Fourier transform of a convolution is product of Fourier transforms of the individual items. Once you've done that, take the back transform to get what you are looking for.