How does moving your legs propel you forward in swimming?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CuriousBanker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Swimming
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of leg movement in swimming, specifically how vertical leg kicks contribute to forward propulsion. Participants explore the physics behind swimming techniques, the role of fluid dynamics, and the relationship between leg movement and forward motion in water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how a downward kick can propel a swimmer forward, questioning the mechanics of vertical leg movement.
  • Another participant suggests that the upward motion of the leg may not contribute to backward movement due to the dynamics of fluid resistance, proposing that the downward kick encounters greater resistance than the upward retraction.
  • A different viewpoint highlights that the effective propulsion from leg kicks is influenced by the angle of the leg and the arc of movement, with the foot's position playing a significant role in water displacement.
  • Some participants discuss the importance of maintaining a horizontal body position to maximize propulsion and minimize resistance during swimming.
  • There is mention of the role of buoyancy in swimming, indicating that additional force is required beyond buoyancy to achieve forward motion.
  • One participant introduces the concept of fluid friction and its impact on swimming efficiency, noting that faster movements encounter greater resistance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanics of leg propulsion in swimming, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed regarding the effectiveness of different kicking techniques and their contributions to forward motion.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about fluid dynamics and the biomechanics of swimming that may not be universally agreed upon. The relationship between leg movement and propulsion is complex and influenced by various factors, including body position and water resistance.

  • #31
marcusl said:
I'm speaking of vortices in the fluid, not rotational motion of a flagellum. At the low Reynolds numbers that Purcell considers, inertia effects are negligible compared to viscous effects (he points out that inertial forces die away in distance of order 0.1 Angstrom!). How are vortex rings sustained in that regime?

As I mentioned, Purcells' paper is a *starting* point, kind of like how frictionless surfaces and massless pulleys are used in introductory mechanics. Since you (apparently) don't have access to Lighthill:

http://maeresearch.ucsd.edu/~elauga/research/references/LaugaPowers09_RPP.pdf

and
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/07/28/1106904108.full.pdf

Figure 8 of #2 is instructive, as vortices are clearly present. In the fluid. More than 0.1 Angstrom away.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thank you, I will read these.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
8K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K