How does one become a nuclear physicist? (go ahead laugh it up im used to it)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pathway to becoming a nuclear physicist, including educational requirements, the distinction between nuclear physics and nuclear engineering, and the attitudes towards studying atomic science. Participants share personal experiences and advice while addressing misconceptions and the seriousness of the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong commitment to studying nuclear science despite facing ridicule, emphasizing the importance of nuclear physicists in future conflicts.
  • Another participant, nearing graduation in nuclear engineering, suggests focusing on undergraduate physics programs and pursuing advanced degrees for a significant impact in nuclear physics.
  • A simplified pathway to becoming a nuclear physicist is proposed, outlining steps from obtaining a B.S. in physics to pursuing a PhD in nuclear physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the importance of communication skills for nuclear physicists, with suggestions to improve writing abilities.
  • A question is posed regarding whether one must become an engineer before becoming a nuclear physicist.
  • The difference between nuclear physics and nuclear engineering is clarified, noting that nuclear engineers typically work in practical applications while nuclear physicists may work in academic settings.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the tone of the initial post, suggesting that the forum generally supports serious inquiries and that nuclear physics is not an exclusive or elevated field.
  • Advice is given to keep options open in education and not to prematurely dismiss other fields of study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the seriousness of pursuing nuclear physics, with some emphasizing its importance while others question the initial post's tone and approach. There is no consensus on the best pathway to becoming a nuclear physicist, as various educational routes and perspectives are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for strong communication skills, while others focus on educational pathways. There is an underlying tension regarding the perceived value and seriousness of nuclear physics as a field of study.

Luongo
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Every time i mention atomic science as an area of study everyone goes HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Yeah well stanton friedman had to have started somewhere, i don't care what others think, i will study 24/7 until I'm 70 if i have to i am interested in this topic and nuclear physicists are ALL that matters once WW III comes out. there will only be nuclear scientists, dictators and everyone else will be civillians. because the next war will be one for the books. but seriously get all the AHAHAHA out of your system and if anyone is willing to be serious about this I'm willing to talk about it, and yes i know the odds of becoming a successful nuclear physicist. I'm aware of everything, does anyone on here have any backround in this subject? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From my personal experiences, being one semester away from graduation with a degree in nuclear engineering, I would recommend you research undergraduate physics programs and get into the best program you can. To have a major impact in a field like Nuclear Physics you will likely need education (Masters, PHD) beyond a general bachelors degree. Therefore, I would recommend your first focus be in getting the best grades possible in a more general physics education then pursue the more "nuclear" side of things in graduate school. A second possibility would be to attend a university that offers nuclear engineering as a major and supplement your undergraduate physics curriculum with some nukeE classes.
 
Go to uni with nuke program---->Obtain B.S.(in physics)--->Goto grad school for nuke program---->obtain PHD in nuke physics

See, not so hard.
 
As a nuclear physicist a lot of your time will be spent communicating with other physicists. It would be valuable to spend the intervening time working on that - punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21
To become a nuclear physicist do you have to become a engineer first?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
As a nuclear physicist a lot of your time will be spent communicating with other physicists. It would be valuable to spend the intervening time working on that - punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, etc.


Hey, I take offense to that. Is this better for you?
 
Luongo said:
Hey, I take offense to that.

Sorry to hear that. It's hardly my fault that you choose to write that way, though. And make no mistake, it is an impediment to your goals.

If you take offense any time someone points out an impediment to your goals, don't expect to get very far.
 
What's the difference between nuclear physics and nuclear engineering? Just the standard practical/theory distinction?
 
Basically, yes. A "nuclear engineer" is an engineer, typically with an engineering degree, who works at a nuclear power plant. A "nuclear physicist" is a scientist with a degree in physics who may work at a nuclear power plant or other type of company but more likely at a University.
 
  • #10
I'm baffled by the tone of this post, just, what?

This forum exists because knowledgeable are happy to share experience and advice with those who look for it. If you've ever visted PF before, or read any of the threads here, you'll know there's never a "HAHAHAHAHAH", as you put it, reaction to any serious questions. I'm puzzled where you might have received such a response - there isn't anything special about being a 'nuclear physicist' - it's simply one of the many branches of physics. I don't see why you seem to think that nuclear physics is on some higher-only-einstein-could-achieve-it plane, but the fact that you're both hinting at that and acting as if it's the only thing you'd ever consider doing means there's some things you need to consider.

Where are you in the education system at the moment? No matter how attractive some things in popular science etc. may seem to be, it's wise to always keep your options open - don't close opinions too early, otherwise you'll come to reject certain fields that you may have enjoyed for no good reason.

Of course it's a good idea to follow things that you think are enjoyable, but only when you have an understanding of what's actually involved in these areas is it sensible to decide to devote all of your time to it. Lastly, I don't believe you really asked any questions in the opening most, it seemed like more of a silly rant. If you have any actual questions, go ahead and ask.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K