How Does Particle Behavior Change in a Shifted Infinite Square Well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eku_girl83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of a particle in a shifted infinite square well, specifically from x=L to x=3L. Participants clarify that the probability distribution must be derived with respect to the new boundary conditions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the original boundaries. The wavefunctions must be expressed as linear combinations of sine and cosine functions rather than pure sine functions, and both methods of solving the problem—starting from scratch or shifting known solutions—are recommended for verification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically infinite square wells.
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in wavefunction analysis.
  • Knowledge of eigenfunctions and their properties in quantum systems.
  • Proficiency in trigonometric identities for manipulating wavefunctions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wavefunctions in infinite square wells with varying boundary conditions.
  • Learn about normalization of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the mathematical implications of shifting the origin in wavefunction analysis.
  • Investigate the differences between sine and cosine functions in quantum eigenstates.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wavefunctions and boundary conditions in infinite square wells.

eku_girl83
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Any help is much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
eku_girl83 said:
Suppose there is a particle in a box (infinite square well) in the ground state. The wall begins at x=L and ends at x=3L. I need to find the probability distribution for the particle.

I know how to work this problem for a well with boundaries at x=0 and x=L. In the new problem, since the width of the box is 3L - L = 2L, can I simply say that the box dimenstions are x=0 to x=2L?
No, because the whole idea here is to have you work with different boundary conditions! If you understand well the case from 0 to L, you should be able to do it from L to 3L.
This preserves the width and makes it much easier to use my boundary conditions to determine k (U(x) = A cos kx +B sin kx), since x = 0 makes the B sin kx term disappear.
Of course but there would be no point in asking this question if you could simply do this. The idea here is that someone has already made the choice to fix the origin at a distance L to the left of the left side of the well, You have to work with that. You then must give the wavefunctions with that choice of origin. It is not as simple as having the box between 0 and L but that`s the whole idea of the question!

There are two ways to proceed (I am not sure if your prof has a preference). You may start from scratch and impose that function is zero at L and at 3L and work out the conditions on A and B. And then you normalize. OR you may start from the already known solutions for 0 to L and shift the origin in these solutions to -L. Using trig identities you will get that the eiegnfunctions are linear combinations of sine and cosine functions instead of being pure sine.

Even better, you sould do it both ways and check that you get the same thing.
Also, how do I determine the ground state psi (x,0)? Is it Ax for O<x<L and A(L-x) for L<x<2L?

Any help is much appreciated!

? As you said above, the solutions are of the form A cos(kx) + Bsin(kx)! There is no way to get the function you just wrote as an eigenstate! You must be confusing with another problem!

For the 0 to L well, the ground state is what? A single sine function. In your new well, it will be alinear combination of a sin and a cos function!

Patrick
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K