How does potential energy affect the motion of a particle?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding how potential energy influences the motion of a particle, specifically through the application of forces and work. A participant struggles with calculating the force acting on a particle at a given position using the potential energy function U(x) = (1.49J/m^4)x^4, and is advised to take the derivative of U with respect to x before substituting the position value. Another participant seeks help with a skiing problem involving energy conservation, where they correctly calculate the skier's speed at the bottom of a slope but encounter difficulties with subsequent calculations involving friction and air resistance. The issue highlighted is the confusion between force and work, emphasizing the need to consider the distance over which forces act when calculating work done. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve problems involving potential energy and motion.
Azytzeen
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Potential Energy Questions, please help, another problem up...

A force parallel to the x-axis acts on a particle moving along the x-axis. This force produces a potential energy U(x) given by U(x)= (1.49J/m^4)x^4.

What is the force (magnitude and direction) when the particle is at position x=-0.835m?

I can't seem to get the right answer for this question. Plugging -0.835m in for x and then solving for F does not work. Maybe my logic is flawed. Please tell me how to reason this out. Thanks in advance.
---
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
F = -dU/dx.

Do the derivative first, then plug in the x value.
 
Ok, got that. Thanks very much. Here's another one that stumped me.

A skier of mass 58.0kg starts from rest at the top of a ski slope of height 70.0m.
If frictional forces do -1.08*10^4 of work on her as she descends, how fast is she going at the bottom of the slope?
Take free fall acceleration to be g=9.80m/s^2.

I used the formula 1/2*m*v_1^2+m*g*y_1+W_other=1/2*m*v_2^2+m*g*y_2

So I canceled out the kinetic energy in the first part as she starts from not moving, and I solved for v_2, which is the correct answer of 31.62 m/s. But part 2 of the problem got me.

Now moving horizontally, the skier crosses a patch of soft snow, where the coefficient of friction is mu=0.170. If the patch is of width 63.0m and the average force of air resistance on the skier is 180N, how fast is she going after crossing the patch?

For this part, I used the same equation, and plugged in 31.62m/s for v_1, and for the W_other, I put in -(180N+0.17*63m*58kg*9.8m/s^2). Then I solved for v_2, but the answer is wrong. This is a 10 attempt problem, and I have one try left. So please help on this again. Thanks!

After crossing the patch of soft snow, the skier hits a snowdrift and penetrates a distance 2.10m into it before coming to a stop. What is the average force exerted on her by the snowdrift as it stops her?

This is part c, which can be solved only after I got part B. Please advise me on how to approach this problem. Thanks again.
 
Azytzeen said:
Now moving horizontally, the skier crosses a patch of soft snow, where the coefficient of friction is mu=0.170. If the patch is of width 63.0m and the average force of air resistance on the skier is 180N, how fast is she going after crossing the patch?

For this part, I used the same equation, and plugged in 31.62m/s for v_1, and for the W_other, I put in -(180N+0.17*63m*58kg*9.8m/s^2). Then I solved for v_2, but the answer is wrong.
You are mixing force and work in that expression. (Look at your units.) The first term (180N) is the force of air resistance, but you need the work done. (You left out the distance.)
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
955
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K