How Does Redshift Change Over Observational Time?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 7K views
fliptomato
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Greetings--this is from Ryden's Introduction to Cosmology, question # 5.2. Let me restate the question:

A light source in a flat, single-component universe has a redshift z when observed at a time [tex]t_0[/tex]. Show that the observed redshift changes at a rate

[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - H_0(1+z)^{\frac{3(1+w)}{2}}[/tex]

Here w is the equation of state parameter for whatever the universe is made of (e.g. w = 0 for matter, 1/3 for radiation).

Here is my best attempt so far:
Simplify notation by introducing [tex]y=\frac{2}{3(1+w)}[/tex]

Then (eq. 5.51 in Ryder):
[tex]1+z = \left(\frac{t_0}{t_e}\right)^y[/tex]
Where [tex]t_e[/tex] is the time at which the light was emitted.

Also (eq. 5.48 in Ryder):
[tex]t_0 = \frac{y}{H_0}[/tex]

So differentiating the first equation w/rt [tex]t_0[/tex], we get:

[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = yt_0^{y-1}t_e^{-y} - y t_e^{-y-1}t_0^y \frac{dt_e}{t0}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - y t_e^{-1} (1+z) \frac{dt_e}{t0}[/tex]

But [tex]\frac{dt_e}{t0} = (1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex] from our equation (5.51) above. Equation (5.52) in Ryder also tell us:

[tex]t_e = \frac{y}{H_0}(1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex]

So plugging these two in:
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - y\left(\frac{H_0}{y}(1+z)^{1/y}\right)(1+z)(1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex]

Which becomes identically zero! Where am I making my mistake?

Thanks,
Flip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this one of those derivatives like you get in thermodynamics where the answer depends on whether you are holding [tex]t_e[/tex] constant? And you end up using something like

[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0}\frac{dt_0}{dt_e}\frac{dt_e}{dz} = -1 ?[/tex]

These always confuse me.

Carl