How Does Symmetry Simplify Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evildarklord1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Quantum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the quantum harmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on the simplification of integrals through symmetry. Participants are exploring the implications of boundary conditions on wavefunctions and the normalization factors involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up boundary conditions for the wavefunction and the role of normalization factors. There is mention of Hermite polynomials and their relation to the harmonic wave functions. Questions arise about how to proceed with integration and the implications of even functions in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance without offering complete solutions. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical framework and the implications of symmetry in the integration process.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance provided. The focus is on understanding the setup and implications of the problem rather than arriving at a final solution.

evildarklord1985
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
untitled.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show work done and the formulas /relations you know, then someone will try to help you.
 
My first thought about this problem is trying to set up a boundary condition for the wavefunction. For 0<x<A, the wavefunction takes the form of simple harmonic oscillators, i.e. N exp(-1/2 alpha x^2) . With boundary condition where psi(x) = 0 at x=0, I'm stuck with the expression of N=0. Maybe, I didn't think it right...
 
N is just a normalization factor, leave that now for the moment.

But you also have Hermite polynomials in the harmonoc wave functions right?
 
so, the harmonic wave function can be written as : N H(y) exp(-1/2 alpha x^2) . With the mentioned boundary condition, do I get N*H(y) = 0 ...how would I go from here on to solve the problem?
 
The energy is calculated as the expectation value of the Hamiltonian i.e.:
[tex]E_{n}=\int{{\phi_{n}{(x)H\phi_{n}(x)dx}}[/tex]
where [tex]\phi_{n}(x)[/tex] is the eigenfunction for the energy-level [tex]E_{n}[/tex]
In the case of an ordinary one-dimensional harmonic oscillator
[tex]H=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\phi}{dx^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}x^{2}[/tex]
And therefore the energy is given by
[tex]E_{n}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{{(\phi_{n}{(x)\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\phi}{dx^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}x^{2}\phi_{n}(x))dx}}[/tex]
In your case you instead integrate from 0 to [tex]\infty[/tex].
So the energy is:
[tex]E_{n}=\int_{0}^{\infty}{{(\phi_{n}{(x)\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\phi}{dx^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2}x^{2}\phi_{n}(x))dx}}[/tex]
 
but then how do you actually carry out the intergration?
 
have you tried? Where do you get stuck?
 
Hi again

I did only give you a clue so you could continue by yourself. But maybe you need some more help. As you know the integral over the even interval [tex]-\infty[/tex] to [tex]\infty[/tex] you can use the fact that the integrand is an even function (why?), i.e.
[tex]f(-x)=f(x)[/tex]

Know you want to integrate over the half interval and therefore use the rule (I suppose you have seen it in some course in mathematics):
[tex]\int_{-a}^{a}f(x)dx=2\int_{0}^{a}f(x)dx[/tex]

I will give you a detailed solution because I want you to try by yourself, but kmow I suppose you have pathway at least.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K