How Does the Adjoint Map Function in Lie Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mandelbroth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the adjoint map in Lie theory, particularly its relationship with Lie algebras and Lie group representations. Participants explore whether it's beneficial to initially separate the concepts of the adjoint map (derivation) and the Adjoint map (automorphism) for better understanding. The conversation highlights different educational approaches, with some recommending starting with Lie algebra representations due to their relevance to Lie groups, as seen in texts like Fulton and Harris. Others suggest that focusing solely on Lie algebra representations, as done in Humphreys' work, is also valid. Ultimately, both approaches are considered effective for grasping the material.
Mandelbroth
Messages
610
Reaction score
24
I'm trying to delve a little deeper into using Lie groups and Lie algebras. Right now, I'm wondering if there's an optimal way to first consider the adjoint map (derivation).

Right now, I'm trying to get comfortable with Lie algebras, so I'm thinking it's best to play the role of the mathematical idiot and not acknowledge that there is a connection between the adjoint map (derivation) and the Adjoint map (automorphism).

Does anyone concur with this ideology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Either approach works. I first learned Lie algebra representations because they provide useful information about Lie group representations and most of the material was motivated by this connection. This is the approach taken in books like Fulton and Harris. Alternatively you could just focus on Lie algebra representations on their own and this is the approach taken in books like Humphreys.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jgens said:
Either approach works. I first learned Lie algebra representations because they provide useful information about Lie group representations and most of the material was motivated by this connection. This is the approach taken in books like Fulton and Harris. Alternatively you could just focus on Lie algebra representations on their own and this is the approach taken in books like Humphreys.
That's actually how this question came up. I'm using my copy of Humphreys for this, and I thought that it was odd to not mention the connection. :-p

Thank you again, jgens.
 
Mandelbroth said:
That's actually how this question came up. I'm using my copy of Humphreys for this, and I thought that it was odd to not mention the connection. :-p

Nah. Once you finish Humphreys definitely read a book on Lie group representations (Fulton and Harris or Knapp would be my recommendations), but for a first fun through the material his approach is fine.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K