How Does the Axiom of Archimedes Prove Integer Density in Real Numbers?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Julio1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Property
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the integer density in real numbers using the Axiom of Archimedes and the Principle of Well Order. The key argument involves defining the set \( S = \{ n \in \mathbb{Z} : n \ge x - 1 \} \), which is shown to be nonempty and has a minimal element \( p \). This leads to the conclusion that \( p \le x \le p + 1 \), confirming that for every real number \( x \), there exists an integer \( p \) such that \( p \le x \le p + 1 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Axiom of Archimedes
  • Familiarity with the Principle of Well Order
  • Basic knowledge of set theory and integer properties
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Axiom of Archimedes in real analysis
  • Explore the Principle of Well Order in the context of ordered sets
  • Investigate integer density and its applications in number theory
  • Review proofs involving sets and minimal elements in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of number theory and set theory.

Julio1
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Show that $(\forall x\in \mathbb{R})(\exists p\in \mathbb{Z}):\, p\le x\le p+1.$Hello :). The Hint is use the Axiom of Archimedes and the Principle of Well Order
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Julio said:
Show that $(\forall x\in \mathbb{R})(\exists p\in \mathbb{Z}):\, p\le x\le p+1.$Hello :). The Hint is use the Axiom of Archimedes and the Principle of Well Order

Hi Julio,

Let $S$ be the set of all $n\in \Bbb Z$ such that $n \ge x - 1$. Then $S$ is nonempty since if $x \le 1$, $1\in S$ and if $x > 1$, the Axiom of Archimedes gives a $k\in \Bbb N$ such that $k \cdot \tfrac{1}{x + 1} > 1$ (so $k\in S$). Hence, by the Principle of Well Order, $S$ has a minimal element, $p$. Thus $p - 1 < x - 1 \le p$, which implies $p \le x \le p + 1$.
 
Thanks :)

But how conclude that $n\ge x-1$? I don't understand :(
 
Julio said:
Thanks :)

But how conclude that $n\ge x-1$? I don't understand :(

It's not a conclusion. I let $S = \{n\in \Bbb Z\,:\, n \ge x - 1\}$. Then I showed $S$ has a minimal element $p$, which satisfies $p \le x \le p + 1$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K