How does the concept of wave functions apply to large objects?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of wave functions and their application to large objects, emphasizing the challenge of understanding how wave-particle duality extends beyond small particles like electrons to larger entities. While all objects possess a wavelength, the wavelength diminishes with size, making quantum effects negligible for macroscopic objects. The conversation references George Gamov's Mr. Tompkins books, illustrating hypothetical scenarios where larger Planck constants would dramatically alter the behavior of large animals. This highlights the contrast between quantum mechanics and classical physics, particularly in how we perceive larger objects. Ultimately, the thread seeks clarification on the implications of wave functions for everyday objects and their observable effects.
Ty1erC
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let me preface this by saying I am no physicist. This is a hobby of mine, and I'm trying to piece together knowledge as pick it up from different sources.

I understand the particle/wave duality of particles like electrons (at least I think so). I cannot grasp, however, the leap in thinking that associates ALL objects (like people) with wave functions. Can someone enlighten me on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything has a wavelength but the larger the object the smaller the wavelength so it's only noticeable for pretty small things - like electrons or photons.

There is a great series of books by the famous physicist George Gamov, the Mr Tompkins books, one of which describes what would happen if Planks constant (the number that sets the size of this effect) were larger. Elephants would just be a little but fussy around the edges but a mosquito would be spread of a cubic mile and impossible to swat. tigers running though a forest would be diffracted and come out at different angles.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K