I How does the cooling effect of this "white-est paint" work?

AI Thread Summary
Purdue has developed a new paint that reflects 98.1% of solar radiation, making it the whitest paint yet and capable of cooling surfaces by 8-19 degrees Fahrenheit. This high reflectivity allows the painted surfaces to radiate more energy than they absorb, potentially enabling low-power air conditioning solutions. The paint's unique properties include reflecting visible light while appearing "black" in the far infrared spectrum, allowing for effective thermal radiation into cooler surroundings. The discussion also contrasts this paint with mirrors, noting that mirrors do not absorb far infrared radiation, which limits their cooling capabilities. The conversation touches on the role of nanoparticles in enhancing thermal management in various applications, including window coatings.
jg167
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
A new result from Purdue https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/rel...-is-here-and-its-the-coolest.-literally..html
Is about the development of a new paint that is the whitest yet, reflecting 98.1% of solar radiation. That is so much that they claim that it causes a cooling effect unseen with previous white paints. This is pretty significant, in the range of 8-19 degrees F. This teases the possibility of very low power (fan only) air-conditioning, which seems like it must be violating basic thermodynamics but hey its Prudue making these claims.

The key seems to be that the reflectivity is so high that the energy absorbed is less than the energy radiated by the painted plate (or any mass above absolute 0) but I might well be misreading that. If that is all it takes wouldn't we expect a very good mirror (99.9%) to do the same thing, and I've never heard of a a mirror being cooler than its surroundings all by itself (but maybe they do?).

Anyway I'd love to hear some elucidation on this.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Science news on Phys.org
There are two competing processes: (1) absorption of the directly beamed sunlight and (2) semi-isotropic thermal radiation characteristic of the temperature of the roof surface.
The enhancement of "whiteness" means that more of the visible and near visible light from sun (98.1%) gets reflected . They also claim that this stuff looks "black" at the 10 um (far IR) blackbody roof radiation peak, so the 300K roof is free to radiate into cold (3K) dark space. According to their reckoning this radiation part is bigger than the 1.9% absorption of sunlight. Seems possible to me.
Your point about the mirror is well taken but it will not absorb (and therefore will not radiate) the 10 um infrared.
 
hutchphd said:
Your point about the mirror is well taken but it will not absorb (and therefore will not radiate) the 10 um infrared.
I am trying to compare / reconcile this with how IR coating on large area window glass reduce incoming IR on sunny days and reduces net loss of IR when it's cold outside. I can confirm that the expensive windows we bought for our conservatory are very effective in reducing extremes of temperature inside. But, of course, the glass is transparent to visible light.

The 'Science' behind my windows is claimed to be Nano Particles. They get everywhere these days, don't they? The self cleaning roof glass is said to use them too.
 
From this (random) article I see that the nanoparticle coating is absorbing the near infrared and so is mostly just blocking (by absorption apparently) incident solar flux ##\lambda>1000nm##.
The radiative processes for a blackbody at 300K peak in the far infrared ##\lambda=10\mu m = 10,000nm## and probably not very important. This was a pretty small effect for the really white stuff too.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Back
Top