How does the Einstein model explain the low heat capacity of diamond?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Einstein model and its explanation for the low heat capacity of diamond, focusing on the relationship between temperature, vibrational frequencies, and heat capacity in the context of statistical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the Einstein model at low temperatures, questioning how the energy states of particles in the diamond lattice relate to its heat capacity. There are inquiries about the relationship between vibrational frequency and characteristic temperature, as well as the impact of diamond's bonding structure on its thermal properties.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the properties of diamond and its vibrational characteristics, while others are seeking clarification on specific relationships and conclusions drawn from the model. Multiple interpretations of the implications of the Einstein model are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of free electrons in diamond and its implications for thermal conductivity and heat capacity, as well as referencing specific pages from a lecture document for further context.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
http://www.ph.ed.ac.uk/~pmonthou/Statistical-Mechanics/documents/SM9.pdf

In the third last paragraph of p36, we are told that the Einstein model discussed in this lecture succesfully explains the low heat capacity of diamond - i can't however see how it does, or at least find an explanation anywhere in that lecture.

I follw the argument that at low T, x is large and so the thermal energy is small in comparison to the energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state but how does that help explain the low heat capacity of diamond - surely all we can gather from this is that it's going to be statistically more likely to find particles in the diamond lattice in the ground state?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


For diamond, \kappa is relatively large (p34), so \omega is large, so T^* is large, so T/T^* is small, so c_v is small.
 


what's the relationship between \omega and T*?

and how did u conclude that C_v was going to be small as a result of that ratio being small?
 


From the bottom of p35, T^*\propto \omega; from the graph on the bottom right of p36, c_v decreases with increasing T^*.
 


You have to look at the properties of diamond. It's SP3 hybrid bond, thus it make a non-polar molecule. We can see that it has no free electron moving inside the lattice and by calculate the total energy inside the 3 dimensional crystal with it's own Madelug constant, we found it's a good heat conductance and good isolator (bandgap 5.5 at 300K). No free electron no electron collision, tightly bond so less translation, the contribute more to vibrational.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K