How does the equation-of-state depend on the Quintessence potential?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dependence of the equation-of-state on the Quintessence potential, specifically the equation w = \frac{\dot \phi^2/2 - V(\phi)}{\dot \phi^2/2+V(\phi)}. It is established that adding constants to the potential V(\phi) does not alter the equation of motion but significantly affects pressure, energy density, and the equation-of-state. A sufficiently large positive constant can make the equation-of-state w indistinguishable from -1, raising questions about the invariance of physics in this context. The potential is characterized as an extensive quantity that cannot be redefined by simply adding a constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quintessence fields and their dynamics
  • Familiarity with the equation-of-state in cosmology
  • Knowledge of energy density and pressure in field theories
  • Basic grasp of general relativity and spacetime curvature
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of varying Quintessence potentials on cosmological models
  • Investigate the role of constants in potential energy functions in field theories
  • Study the relationship between energy density and spacetime curvature in general relativity
  • Examine the conditions under which the equation-of-state approaches -1 in dark energy models
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and researchers studying dark energy and the dynamics of Quintessence fields will benefit from this discussion.

Amanheis
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Quintessence fields are supposed to slowly roll down a potential V(\phi). Adding constants to the potential obviously does not change the equation of motion for this field, but it does change the pressure, energy density and equation-of-state. In particular, if I choose a sufficiently large positive consant, the equation of state
w = \frac{\dot \phi^2/2 - V(\phi)}{\dot \phi^2/2+V(\phi)}
becomes eventually indistinguishable from -1.

Shouldn't physics stay invariant in this case?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Amanheis said:
Quintessence fields are supposed to slowly roll down a potential V(\phi). Adding constants to the potential obviously does not change the equation of motion for this field, but it does change the pressure, energy density and equation-of-state. In particular, if I choose a sufficiently large positive consant, the equation of state
w = \frac{\dot \phi^2/2 - V(\phi)}{\dot \phi^2/2+V(\phi)}
becomes eventually indistinguishable from -1.

Shouldn't physics stay invariant in this case?

yes,this potential is some quantily of energy density deimension and have absolute value to curve the space time.You can't redifine it by adding a constant. It is an extensive quantity right over there.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
649
Replies
4
Views
658