How Does the Equipartition Theorem Apply to Diatomic Molecules in a Box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gravitino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Gravitino
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equipartition Theorem

1. Kerson Huang, P 7.2:
Consider a classical system of N noninteracting diatomic molecules in a box of volume V at temperature T. The Hamiltonian for a single molecule is taken to be

[tex]H=\frac{1}{2m}(\vec{p_1}^2+\vec{p_2}^2) +\frac{K}{2}(|\vec{r_1}-\vec{r_2}|^2)[/tex].

Obtain the internal energy and show that it is consistent with equipartition theorem.

2. Homework Equations and attempt
I used the formulae for partition function

[tex]Q_N = \frac{1}{N!}Q_1[/tex]

where

[tex]Q_1 = \int d \omega e^{-\beta H}[/tex]

Further, I moved to the center of mass frame, and wrote the Hamiltonan in this form:

[tex]H= \frac{P_{cm}^2}{4m} + \frac{p^2}{4m} +\frac{Kr^2}{2}[/tex]

where now [tex]\vec{r}=\vec{r_1}-\vec{r_2}[/tex] and the mass of two atoms the same, while we all know what center of mass frame is (it is not too imprtant for my question to show all the way of derivations, I guess).

After all, using [tex]E =-\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln Q_N[/tex]

I found that [tex]E=\frac{9}{2}Nk_BT[/tex].

3. Question
According to equipartition theorem and using my last modified Hamiltonian looks I have 9 degrees of freedom and everything looks like being consistent. However, as far as I know, the diatomic molecule has 6 degrees of freedom (in case it is not rigid molecule). If I think, like that, then I am missing the factor (instead of 6 I have 9). Can you help me, where I am wrong?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Gravitino said:
1. Kerson Huang, P 7.2:
According to equipartition theorem and using my last modified Hamiltonian looks I have 9 degrees of freedom and everything looks like being consistent. However, as far as I know, the diatomic molecule has 6 degrees of freedom (in case it is not rigid molecule). If I think, like that, then I am missing the factor (instead of 6 I have 9). Can you help me, where I am wrong?
I am guessing that the quantum consideration gave wrong result, the fact that the relative distance actually does not vary from 0 to infinity in phase space in classical universe gave probably a weird result...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K