How does the function f(x)=0^{-x} behave for positive and complex numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Strange
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x)=0^{-x} is defined for negative values of x, yielding 0, but presents challenges for positive real numbers and complex numbers. For positive real x, regularization can be considered, similar to the interpretation of \sqrt{x}. In the complex case, the function is expressed as y^x = (\rho e^{i\alpha})^{(a+ib)}, where y must be non-zero (y ≠ 0) to maintain validity. The calculations yield R = ρ^a e^{-\alpha b} and β = b log ρ + α a, confirming the necessity of a non-zero base in complex exponentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and logarithms
  • Knowledge of regularization techniques in mathematical functions
  • Basic calculus concepts related to limits and continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of complex exponentiation and its implications
  • Study regularization methods for functions with indeterminate forms
  • Explore the behavior of functions with zero bases in different mathematical contexts
  • Learn about the implications of domain restrictions in mathematical functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the behavior of functions involving zero bases and complex numbers.

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
how this function f(x)= 0^{-x}

should be understood? , if x is NEGATIVE, we find no problems, since 0 raised to any power is 0

but how about x being a positive real number ? , or x being a PURE COMPLEX or complex number ?

could we consider a 'regularization' to this f(x) so f(x)_{reg}=0 is always 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would imagine the same way you would understand \sqrt{x}. It's assumed that the domain is restricted only to numbers that make sense.

If you have some context where you think you really need to plug 1 into the function, you should post the full setup here
 
In the real case, the function

f(x,y)=y^x=e^{x\log y}

is defined only for y>0

In the complex case, put

y=\rho e^{i\alpha}\qquad\textrm{and}\qquad x=a+ib

then

y^x=(\rho e^{i\alpha})^{(a+ib)}

and, after some calculations, you find

y^x=Re^{i\beta}

with

R=\rho^ae^{-\alpha b}\qquad\textrm{and}\qquad\beta=b\log\rho+\alpha a

So in the complex case you must have \rho\neq 0, which means y\neq 0.

I hope I didn't meke calculation errors...try it yourself! :redface:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K