How Does the Schrödinger Equation Account for Rest Mass Energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Schrödinger Equation and rest mass energy. It clarifies that while Einstein's equation \(E=K+m_{0}c^2\) includes rest mass energy, the non-relativistic Schrödinger Equation does not explicitly account for it. Instead, when expanding the relativistic energy equation \(E=\sqrt{p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4}\) in powers of momentum \(p\), the rest mass energy term \(mc^2\) is treated as a constant and omitted for convenience, as it does not affect the physical outcomes in non-relativistic scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence, \(E=mc^2\)
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger Equation and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of relativistic energy equations
  • Concept of Taylor expansion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-relativistic vs. relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the Schrödinger Equation
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions in the context of physics
  • Investigate the role of potential energy in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in the foundational concepts of energy and mass in quantum theory.

hyena
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i know its a stupid question but I am a beginner:
according to eisntein:
[tex]E=K+m_{o}c^2[/tex]
but the plane wave solution yields that particle's KE is its total energy,where free particle has no potential energy. But where is the rest mass energy[tex]m_{o}c^2[/tex]? Is it omitted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Schrödinger's equation is non-relativistic.
 
If we start with

[tex]E=\sqrt{p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4}[/tex]

and Taylor-expand in powers of [itex]p[/itex], we get

[tex]E=mc^2 + {p^2\over 2m} + \ldots[/tex]

The second term is the usual nonrelativistic kinetic energy. The first term is a constant, and so could be added to the potential energy. But it has no physical consequences, so it's just omitted for convenience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K