How does this experimental result show photon emission?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interpretation of experimental results related to photon emission, particularly in the context of bremsstrahlung radiation and the implications of classical versus quantum theories of electromagnetism. Participants explore how the behavior of electrons under acceleration leads to the emission of electromagnetic radiation, questioning the necessity of quantizing the electromagnetic field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the process of electron ejection and acceleration, suggesting that varying decelerations lead to different emitted frequencies, with "lucky" electrons emitting maximum frequency due to immediate stopping.
  • Others argue that the emission of electromagnetic radiation can be explained by Maxwell's theory, which does not require the quantization of the electromagnetic field.
  • There is a contention regarding whether a limit on energy in Maxwell's model implies a limit on frequency, with some asserting that it does not, while others maintain that only in the photon model does energy limit frequency.
  • Participants discuss the implications of Maxwell's model, noting that it predicts an unbounded range of frequencies, including gamma rays, which some consider a flaw in the model.
  • One participant mentions the Lienard-Wiechert potential as a method to calculate emitted electromagnetic waves from an accelerated charge, leading to a continuous spectrum of radiation.
  • There is acknowledgment that the classical bremsstrahlung spectrum is not uniform and includes a range of frequencies, but some participants express confusion about how frequency is determined in Maxwell's model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of quantizing the electromagnetic field and the implications of Maxwell's model versus the photon model. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the relationship between energy, frequency, and the emission of radiation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the relationship between acceleration and frequency, the dependence on classical versus quantum descriptions, and unresolved mathematical interpretations of the bremsstrahlung spectrum.

rtareen
Messages
162
Reaction score
32
TL;DR
This experiment (not sure what it is called) is supposed to show that light is emitted as photons. However, the results can be explained in terms of Maxwell's model. Book section attached. Book is Sears & Zemansky University Physics 14th edition.
First I'll explain my understanding, because I'm not very confident in it. The main point is that the electrons are ejected and then accelerated to a very high kinetic energy. Then they start smashing into the anode. Most will go through a series of collisions before completely stopping, so that the decelerations will vary, and thus the emitted frequency will vary. But the "lucky" ones will get stopped immediately, so they emit the max frequency, since they undergo the max deceleration.

The book says the fact that there is a max frequency shows that these x-rays are being emitted as photons. However, if we use Maxwell's model, there should still be a max frequency since there is a limit to the initial potential energy, so that there is a limit to the max deceleration. So what I am not understanding?

(PS It was never really explained, but I'm assuming frequency is proportional to acceleration).
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, this doesn't at all show that the em. field has to be quantized, but you get the emission of em. radiation also from Maxwell's theory. What you describe is "bremsstrahlung".

[EDIT: This was wrong! See posting #4 by @PeterDonis ]

In fact, it is not so easy to really show that the em. field has to be quantized. A lot can be understood from the semiclassical theory, where the charges (electrons and/or atomic nuclei) are treated by quantum theory and the em. field as a classical field. The photoeffect, e.g., can be understood by first-order perturbation theory where classical em. radiation excites a quantum-mechanically described electron bound to an atom to the continuous spectrum, such that it escapes the atom. The same holds for the Compton effect.

The most simple hint at the fact that one indeed needs also to quantize the em. field was found by Einstein in 1917 when explaining the Planck black-body radiation formula from a kinetic argument, i.e., by the emission and absorption rates of em. radiation by the walls of the container. The thermal-equilibrium condition is that the emission rate equals the absorption rate such that the total number of photons in each wave modes stays constant in time (on average). It turned out that Einstein had to assume not only absorption and "induced emission" but also spontaneous emission. This latter contribution is due to the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field and does not exist in the classical description of the em. field.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rtareen
rtareen said:
if we use Maxwell's model, there should still be a max frequency since there is a limit to the initial potential energy, so that there is a limit to the max deceleration

No. In Maxwell's model, a limit on the energy carried by a single pulse of radiation does not imply any limit on the frequency of the radiation; a pulse carrying a given energy ##E## can contain radiation of any frequency (and would be expected to--the Maxwell model of the pulse would be a wave packet with no frequency cutoff). Only in the photon model does a limit on energy imply a limit on frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rtareen
vanhees71 said:
this doesn't at all show that the em. field has to be quantized

I disagree. See below.

vanhees71 said:
you get the emission of em. radiation also from Maxwell's theory

But you don't get a limit on the frequency of the radiation from Maxwell's theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rtareen and vanhees71
That's true! I stand corrected!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rtareen
rtareen said:
It was never really explained, but I'm assuming frequency is proportional to acceleration

The energy carried by the radiation is proportional to the acceleration (actually deceleration). But in the Maxwell model, as noted, this does not imply anything about the frequency of the radiation. Only in the photon model does the energy carried by the radiation imply anything about its frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
PeterDonis said:
No. In Maxwell's model, a limit on the energy carried by a single pulse of radiation does not imply any limit on the frequency of the radiation; a pulse carrying a given energy ##E## can contain radiation of any frequency (and would be expected to--the Maxwell model of the pulse would be a wave packet with no frequency cutoff). Only in the photon model does a limit on energy imply a limit on frequency.
PeterDonis said:
The energy carried by the radiation is proportional to the acceleration (actually deceleration). But in the Maxwell model, as noted, this does not imply anything about the frequency of the radiation. Only in the photon model does the energy carried by the radiation imply anything about its frequency.
So in Maxwell's model the deceleration says nothing about the frequency. How is frequency determined in Maxwell's model? The book says that, according to Maxwell, the deceleration will cause all frequencies to be emitted, specifically all x-ray frequencies. But if there's no limit wouldn't some gamma rays be emitted as well? I don't really understand that.
 
rtareen said:
How is frequency determined in Maxwell's model?

It isn't. All frequencies have an equal chance to be radiated in Maxwell's model.

rtareen said:
if there's no limit wouldn't some gamma rays be emitted as well?

Under Maxwell's model, yes, we would expect gamma rays to be emitted. In other words, this is a wrong prediction of Maxwell's model.
 
PeterDonis said:
It isn't. All frequencies have an equal chance to be radiated in Maxwell's model.
Under Maxwell's model, yes, we would expect gamma rays to be emitted. In other words, this is a wrong prediction of Maxwell's model.

Makes sense! Thanks!
 
  • #10
rtareen said:
So in Maxwell's model the deceleration says nothing about the frequency. How is frequency determined in Maxwell's model? The book says that, according to Maxwell, the deceleration will cause all frequencies to be emitted, specifically all x-ray frequencies. But if there's no limit wouldn't some gamma rays be emitted as well? I don't really understand that.
In Maxwell's theory you can calculate the electromagnetic wave emitted by an accelerated point charge by using the socalled Lienard-Wiechert potential (retarded potential) or equivalently the Jefimenko-equations. What you get is a continuous spectrum of em. waves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung

Due to quantum theory you must at least create one photon. If the electron has moved through an accelerating electrostatic potential ##V## it has an energy of ##E=e V##. Thus for the frequency of the bremsstrahlung photons you get ##\hbar \omega_{\text{max}}=e V##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rtareen
  • #11
PeterDonis said:
It isn't. All frequencies have an equal chance to be radiated in Maxwell's model.
The classical bremsstrahlung spectrum is not a uniform frequency distribution of course. You find the classical bremsstrahlung spectrum, e.g., for scattering at a Coulomb potential calculated in Landau and Lifshitz vol. 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and rtareen
  • #12
vanhees71 said:
The classical bremsstrahlung spectrum is not a uniform frequency distribution of course.

Yes, you're right, I was being sloppy. But the classical spectrum does include an unbounded range of frequencies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
13K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K