How Does Time Evolution Affect a Particle's Wave Function in a Quantum System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem from Griffiths' textbook, specifically concerning the time evolution of a particle's wave function in an infinite square well. The original poster is trying to understand why the wave function remains a superposition of the first two stationary states over time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the wave function's evolution, questioning why it remains a superposition of the initial states. They discuss the implications of coefficients in the wave function and their behavior over time.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of time evolution and superposition in quantum mechanics. Some have offered insights into the role of coefficients and phase factors, while others are seeking clarification on the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references specific equations and concepts from quantum mechanics, indicating a structured approach to the problem. There is an emphasis on understanding the definitions and properties of the wave function and its coefficients.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
This is Problem comes from Griffiths Quantum Mechanics textbook; specifically, it is problem 2.5 (b).

A particle in an infinite square well has its initial wave function an even mixture of the first two stationary states:

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x,0) = A[\psi_1(x) + \psi_2(x)][/itex]

Here is the part of the problem that I am having a little trouble with:

(b) Find [itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x,t)[/itex] and [itex]\displaystyle |\Psi(x,t)|^2[/itex]|. Express the latter as a sinusoidal function of time, as in Example 2.1. To simplify the result, let [itex]\omega \equiv \frac{\pi^2 \hbar}{2ma^2}[/itex]

According to the answer key, even after t=0, the wave function continues to be a mixture of the first two stationary states. Why is that? I am having a little difficulty understanding this. Why can't it be a new 'mixture?'

As far as I understand, to calculate the wavefunction for all future times, we use the equations

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi (x,t) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \left( \frac{n \pi}{a} x \right) e^{-i(n^2 \pi^2 \hbar/2ma^2)t}[/itex]

and

[itex]\displaystyle c_n = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \int_0^a \sin \left( \frac{n \pi}{a} x \right) \Psi (x,0) dx[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand your question. ##\Psi## will evolve with time, but it will remain a superposition of ##\psi_1## and ##\psi_2##.
 
That's precisely my question. Why will it remain as a superposition of the two states, even after t=0?
 
At t=0, ##c_n = 0## for ##n>2##, right? So the coefficient of ##\psi_n## for ##n>2## will be 0 as well for ##t>0##.
 
Oh, so the coefficients do not change with time?
 
The coefficients of ##\psi_1## and ##\psi_2## change with time as they pick up a phase factor. If you look at the formula for ##\Psi(x,t)##, you should be able to see that the coefficient of ##\psi_1##, for instance, is ##c_1 e^{-i\omega t}##. But the ##c_n##'s are defined in terms of ##\Psi## when ##t=0##, so they're just constants.
 
Are you familiar with the time evolution operator in the form ##U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hbar}##? See if you can find it in your book. Once you understand it, you should find it easy to use it to answer your question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K