How Does Time Periodicity Affect Wavepacket Position in Quantum Mechanics?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 3K views
Shomy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm supposed to show that whatever superposition of harmonic oscillator states is used to construct wavepacket of the form [tex]\sum[/tex] cv[tex]\Psi[/tex] (x,t) (cv are arbitary complex coefficients), it is at the same place at the times 0, T, 2T,.. where T = 2 [tex]\pi[/tex]/[tex]\omega[/tex]


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking of using the position operator on the function and subbing t = 2n [tex]\pi[/tex]/[tex]\omega[/tex] as the time but i don't really know where to start
PHP:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shomy said:

Homework Statement



I'm supposed to show that whatever superposition of harmonic oscillator states is used to construct wavepacket of the form [tex]\sum[/tex] cv[tex]\Psi[/tex] (x,t) (cv are arbitary complex coefficients), it is at the same place at the times 0, T, 2T,.. where T = 2 [tex]\pi[/tex]/[tex]\omega[/tex]


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking of using the position operator on the function and subbing t = 2n [tex]\pi[/tex]/[tex]\omega[/tex] as the time but i don't really know where to start

WHat is the time dependence of each term in your sum? Consider shifting the time t by [tex]2 \pi / \omega[/tex] and see what happens.
 
There was no other information given. What do you mean by shifting the time??
 
Shomy said:
There was no other information given. What do you mean by shifting the time??

First things first. What is the time dependence of the total wavefunction? Psi is a linear combination of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, right? What is the time dependence of each eigenstate? What i sthe time dependence of the total wavefunction? Can you writ edown the total wavefunction, showing explicitly its time dependence?

Then you should simply replace t by t+2 pi/omega in you expression and you should see that the total wavefunction remains unchanged. That's what I meant by "shifting the time".
 
Redbelly98 said:
It has been a while for me, but I believe nrged is saying to apply the time-evolution operator,

e^(iHt)
or maybe it was
e^(-iHt)

Have the covered this concept in your class?

Well, it could be done this way, yes. But I had something simpler in mind...see my previous post.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay. I didn't see the necessary e^iwt factors explicitly in the original description, but perhaps they are in Shomy's textbook or class notes description of the H.O. wavefunctions.

That's what I wanted him/her to realize: that there are factors [tex]e^{-iE_n t/\hbar}[/tex]