How Does Ehrenfest Theorem Apply to Particle Position in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noblegas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use ehrenfest theorem ([tex]i*\hbar*d<Q>/dt=(\varphi(t),[Q,H],\varphi(t))[/tex] to show that the expectation value of the position of a particlee that moves in 3 dimensions with the Hamiltonian [tex]H=p^2/2m+V(r)[/tex] satisfies [tex]d<r>/dt=<p>/m[/tex]

Homework Equations

([tex]i*\hbar*d<Q>/dt=(\varphi(t),[Q,H],\varphi(t))[/tex]

or [tex]d<Q>/dt=<-i[Q,H]/(\hbar)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex][Q,H]=QH-HQ=Q((-i*\hbar*d/dx)^2/2m+V(r))-((-i*\hbar*d/dx)^2/2m+V(r))(Q)=Q*(\hbar)^2 d^2/dx^2*1/2m +QV(r)-(\hbar)^2 d^2Q/dx^2*1/2m+V(r)Q=QV(r)-(\hbar)^2 d^2Q/dx^2*1/2m+V(r)Q[/tex] not sure how to continue this problem

Perhaps i should say: [tex]i*\hbar*d<r>/dt=[\varphi, [r,H]\varphi][/tex]
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
anybody find a hard time reading the latex code or all of the country
 
noblegas said:
Perhaps i should say: [tex]i*\hbar*d<r>/dt=[\varphi, [r,H]\varphi][/tex]

That looks like the best starting point to me...what do you get when you do that?
 
[tex]i*\hbar*d/dt=[\varphi, [r,H]\varphi]=[\varphi, [r,p^2/2m+V(x,t)]\varphi]=[\varphi, (r*p^2/2m+V(x,t)-p^2/2m+V(x,t)*r)\varphi]=1/(i*\hbar*2*m)*<[x,p]*d(p^2)/dp>=(<i*\hbar*2*p>)/(i*\hbar*2*m)=<p>/m[/tex]? Please take a look at my latex code because I don't think latex displayed all of my solution
 
Your [itex]\LaTeX[/itex] is terrible!

Click on the image below to see how to generate something more legible:

[tex]i\hbar\frac{d\langle r\rangle}{dt}=(\varphi, [r,H]\varphi)=(\varphi, [r,p^2/2m+V(r)]\varphi)[/tex]

You need to be careful to only use square brackets to represent commutators,and round brackets otherwise. There is also no need to use the * symbol to represent multiplication, it just makes things look messy. And you should use \frac when appropriate. Also, your potential is given to you as a function of [itex]r[/itex]...why would you write it as a function of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex]?

continue from here...
 
[tex] i\hbar\frac{d\langle r\rangle}{dt}=(\varphi, [r,H]\varphi)=(\varphi, [r,p^2/2m+V(r)]\varphi)=1/(2*\hbar*m*i)*(<[x,p]d(p^2)/dp>)=1/(2*\hbar*m*i)*(<[i*\hbar*2p>)=<p>/m[/tex] hope this is better
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K