How Does Zee Derive the Double Factorial in QFT's Gaussian Integral?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the derivation of the double factorial in the context of quantum field theory (QFT) and Gaussian integrals, specifically referencing Zee's work. Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in calculating integrals of the form \(\int e^{-1/2ax^2}dx\) and the implications of using differential operators in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the transition from a straightforward derivation of the Gaussian integral to the application of the operator \(-2(d/da)\) to derive the expectation value \(\langle x^{2n} \rangle\).
  • Another participant suggests calculating \(I_0(a) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,e^{-ax^2}\) and notes that \(x^2\,e^{-ax^2} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial a}e^{-ax^2}\), leading to a formal trick for deriving \(I_{2n}(a)\).
  • There is a request for the value of \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,x^2\,e^{-1/2\,ax^2}\) and a suggestion that this could simplify the process of deriving the double factorial expression.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of knowing the value of \(\int dx \exp{(- a x^2)} = \sqrt{\pi/a}\) for calculating the \(x^2\) integral.
  • A later reply challenges the clarity of previous explanations and insists that the differential must be applied correctly to derive the factorial expression sought by the original poster.
  • One participant shares a link to an external resource for further clarification on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement on the general approach to the problem but express differing levels of understanding regarding the application of differential operators and the specific integrals involved. The discussion remains unresolved with respect to the clarity of certain steps in the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the derivation relies on formal tricks and may require further proof, indicating that the steps taken are not universally accepted as straightforward. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding notation and the application of operators.

BWV
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
2,012
reading Zee's QFT Theory in a Nutshell and on p 13 on the explanation of the Gaussian integral he loses me going from (9) to (10) by jumping from a relatively straightforward derivation of \int e^{-1/2ax^2}dx
by then saying "acting on this with -2(d/da)

to get <x^{2n}> ={\int e^{-1/2ax^2}x^{2n}dx}/{\int e^{-1/2ax^2}dx}= \frac{1}{a^n}(2n-1)!

not sure how he gets to the double factorial expression - how do you know this integral would not diverge?

also not clear on the meaning of -2(d/da) as an operator

assuming the notation <x> means the expectation of some arbitrary variable

the wiki article and other internet sources on Wick's theorem refers to ordering of creation and annihilation operators, which Zee has not mentioned yet

sorry for the rambling post, but any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is to calculate

I_0(a) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,e^{-ax^2}

Then you observe that

x^2\,e^{-ax^2} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial a}e^{-ax^2}

Now you rewrite the integral as follows

I_2(a) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,x^2\,e^{-ax^2} = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,\left(-\frac{\partial}{\partial a}\right)e^{-ax^2} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial a} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,e^{-ax^2} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial a} I_0(a)

Of course this is a formal trick and requires a proof in principle.

From now one you can continue with

I_{2n}(a) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial a} I_{2n-2}(a)

and

I_{2n}(a) = \left(-\frac{\partial}{\partial a}\right)^{2} I_{0}(a)
 
Last edited:
But what does \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,x^2\,e^{-1/2\,ax^2} give? Does someone have a Gaussian table handy to look it up?

From then on it should be easy. Just hit on the result repeatedly with -2(d/da) and after you have done so n times, divide by (2pi/a)^1/2.
 
Last edited:
The point is that you can figure out the x^2 integral only knowing the value of the \int dx \exp{(- a x^2)} = \sqrt{\pi/a}. Tom's post explains how.
 
Physics Monkey said:
The point is that you can figure out the x^2 integral only knowing the value of the \int dx \exp{(- a x^2)} = \sqrt{\pi/a}. Tom's post explains how.

What x^2 integral? Also, it's not \int dx \exp{(- a x^2)}, but \int dx\,x^2\,e^{-1/2\,ax^2} and Tom did not explain (as far as I understand his post) that we have to take the differential on both sides to get this factioral expression on the RHS, which was the OP question about.

Anyway, here is a crystal clear explanation of what goes on:

http://www.weylmann.com/gaussian.pdf
 
in order to keep things exciting I hesitated to provide all the details and the final result ;-)

start with the well-known result for

I_0(a) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dx\,e^{-ax^2}

and calculate

I_{2n}(a) = \left(-\frac{\partial}{\partial a}\right)^{2} I_{0}(a);\;\;n=1,2,\ldots

that's all you need
 
Last edited:
thanks everyone for the responses and the link to the weylmann.com site, it was all very helpful
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K