How electric potential boundary condition works

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving electric potential and boundary conditions in a system with a spherical dielectric mass containing an electric dipole, surrounded by a conductive spherical shell. The participants are exploring the implications of boundary conditions for electric potential, particularly in relation to induced charge densities and the application of Gauss' law.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the boundary condition equation related to electric potential and questioning whether the charge density refers to the induced charge density or the charge density of the shell. There is also a discussion about the correct interpretation of the terms in the boundary condition equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the interpretation of the boundary condition, suggesting that the charge density in question may refer to the net charge density, including induced charges. Others are clarifying the distinction between free and bound charge densities and referencing specific sections from Griffiths' textbook to support their points.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the charge of the conductive shell, as the original problem does not specify it. Participants are also navigating the implications of different charge densities in the context of the boundary conditions being discussed.

tomasg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
Inside a sperical dielectric mass there is a electric dipole on the center of the sphere. The sphere has radius a. This dieletric sphere is inside and on the center of a conductive spherical shell of radius b. The problem asks to find the potentials and then the electric fields in every region, inside the dielectric sphere, the space between the sphere and the shell and outside the shell.

Homework Equations


Its given that p=p0*z (the dipole looks towards +z )

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Now, i have written all the potentials (the solutions of laplace) but i noticed that i haven't fully understood one boundary condition for the electric potential. The one that says ε2(∂Vout/∂r)-ε1(∂V/∂r)=-σ(θ)/ε0.
The problem doesn't say anything about the charge of the shell, so i suppose is zero. So my question is this, does the σ(θ) of the above condition refers to the induced charge density (which would not be zero in this example i think) or the charge density of the shell alone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well I'm not an expert so pardon me if I'm wrong...But the above equation refers to the discontinuity of the electric field in the boundaries of two media,which is derived from Gauss' law.And the charge density in Gauss' law is the net charge density(due to induction too).So I think the charge density refers to the net charge density,which in this case is the induce charge density...
 
Thanks for the reply. I believe this is true too. Atleast that's what i have understand after reading more caerefully griffith's book
 
tomasg said:
ε2(∂Vout/∂r)-ε1(∂V/∂r)=-σ(θ)/ε0.
This equation does not look quite right. The left side gives the change in the radial component of D (not E). The right hand side should then be -σfree(θ) without any ε0.

σfree is the free charge density on the boundary surface between the two dielectric materials.

If you wrote the left hand side without the ε2 and ε1 as ∂Vout/∂r- ∂V/∂r, then you now have radial components of E. Then the right hand side would be -σ(θ)/ε0 and σ(θ) would be the total surface charge density (free plus bound).

I have an older 3rd edition of Griffiths. In this edition, there is a section 4.3.3 called "Boundary Conditions". Here you find the equations

Dabove - Dbelow = σf where σf is free charge density.

and

Eabove - Ebelow = σ/ε0 where σ is total charge density.
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
This equation does not look quite right. The left side gives the change in the radial component of D (not E). The right hand side should then be -σfree(θ) without any ε0.

σfree is the free charge density on the boundary surface between the two dielectric materials.

If you wrote the left hand side without the ε2 and ε1 as ∂Vout/∂r- ∂V/∂r, then you now have radial components of E. Then the right hand side would be -σ(θ)/ε0 and σ(θ) would be the total surface charge density (free plus bound).

I have an older 3rd edition of Griffiths. In this edition, there is a section 4.3.3 called "Boundary Conditions". Here you find the equations

Dabove - Dbelow = σf where σf is free charge density.

and

Eabove - Ebelow = σ/ε0 where σ is total charge density.

yes i should not put the ε0 there. Thank you so much sir for the answer. It finally makes sense to me. And as the user above said, the Eabove - Ebelow = σ/ε0= (σf+σb)/ε0 <--- in this equation the σf could be the induced charge density or the charge density we created in the conductor (or both). Right?
 
tomasg said:
And as the user above said, the Eabove - Ebelow = σ/ε0= (σf+σb)/ε0 <--- in this equation the σf could be the induced charge density or the charge density we created in the conductor (or both). Right?
I'm not sure I'm understanding your question. In your problem, the inner surface of the conducting sphere will have a free charge density σf which is the charge density induced on the inner surface of the spherical conductor by the dielectric sphere with the dipole. So if you are applying the equation to the inner surface of the conductor, the σ in σ/ε0 would be this σf.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K