How Far Above a Planet's Surface is a Starship if Gravity is Halved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pureouchies4717
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a starship orbiting a distant planet, where the astronauts observe that the gravitational acceleration at their altitude is half that at the planet's surface. The task is to determine how far above the planet's surface the starship is, expressed as a multiple of the planet's radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the formula for gravitational acceleration to find the altitude, but expresses uncertainty about their initial conclusion. Some participants discuss the relationship between gravitational acceleration and distance, while others question how the mathematical result relates to the requirement of expressing the altitude as a multiple of the planet's radius.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem and the mathematical relationships involved. There is some productive engagement regarding the definitions of variables and the implications of the calculations, though consensus on the interpretation of the results has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the requirement to express the altitude as a multiple of the planet's radius, and some participants are clarifying their understanding of the mathematical relationships involved.

pureouchies4717
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
this is the question:
A starship is circling a distant planet of radius R. The astronauts find that the acceleration due to gravity at their altitude is half the value at the planet's surface. How far above the surface are they orbiting? Your answer will be a multiple of R.

using a= (GM)/r^2, i found out that d=2R

this is wrong, though

can someone please help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Explanation.

NOTES:
I will define 'a' as the planet's acceleration.
I will definie 'A' as the spaceship's acceleration.
I will define 'd' as their current altitude with respect to the planet.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

[tex]a_g = (G M) / r^2[/tex]

The planet has a r=R, so the 'a' at the planet's surface is:

[tex]a_g = (G M) / R^2[/tex]

They realize that their 'A' at their altitude is 'a/2'

[tex]A_g = (G M) / d^2[/tex]
OR
[tex](a/2)_g = (G M) / d^2[/tex]

Let's look at this for a second. Everything in this equation is constant except for [tex]R^2[/tex] and [tex]d^2[/tex] and acceleration of gravity.

We can summarize this: [tex]a_g \sim 1/r^2[/tex]

The acceleration of gravity is inversely proportional to r-squared. If we double the distance r, the acceleration is 1/4 than it was at a distance r.

So... solving for 'r'.

[tex]r^2 = 1/a_g[/tex]
[tex]r = \sqrt{1/a_g}[/tex]

So if the acceleration is 1/2

[tex]r = \sqrt{1/1/2}[/tex]
[tex]r = \sqrt{2}[/tex]

So there is your answer, mathematically... Now, having your answer as a multiple of r means ANY REAL number, not a whole number.
 
Last edited:
thank you!

:!)
 
i don't understand... i understand how r = sqrt of 2, mathematically, but how does this equate to being a multiple of r?
 
mawalker said:
i don't understand... i understand how r = sqrt of 2, mathematically, but how does this equate to being a multiple of r?

nevermind...i see what was going on... tricky problem i entered the square root of 2 twice and now i understand that they ask (how far above)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K