How Far is the 4th Maximum from the Central Maximum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5hassay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The fourth maximum in double-slit light interference is located 2.0 x 10-2 m from the central maximum, based on the formula xm = (m - 1)Δx, where Δx is the distance between adjacent maxima, calculated as 6.0 x 10-3 m. The central maximum is defined as the first maximum (m=1), making the fourth maximum (m=4) the third maximum away from the center. This calculation confirms the correct application of the double-slit interference principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double-slit light interference principles
  • Familiarity with the formula for distance between maxima: Δx = λL/d
  • Knowledge of mth maximum notation in interference patterns
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the double-slit interference formula Δx = λL/d
  • Explore the concept of constructive and destructive interference in wave physics
  • Learn about the significance of the mth maximum in wave patterns
  • Investigate practical applications of double-slit experiments in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching wave interference, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior in double-slit experiments.

5hassay
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How far would the fourth maximum be from the central maximum, provided the distance between maxima is [tex]6. \times 10^{-3} m[/tex] and this is double-slit light interference?

Homework Equations



See solution.

The Attempt at a Solution



It is known that the central maximum in double-slit light interference is the central bright band on the screen.
Using the notation mth maximum (not mth-order maximum), the central maximum would be the first maximum (m=1) and the fourth maximum (m=4) would be the third maximum away.
It is known that the distance between adjacent nodal lines (minima -- destructive interference) is defined as,
[tex]\Delta x = \frac{\lambda L}{d}[/tex]
This is equal to the distance between adjacent maxima.
So, because there is three equal spaces between adjacent nodal lines from the central maximum to the fourth maximum (using mth maximum notation):
[tex]x_{m} = (m - 1) \Delta x[/tex]
, where, xm is the distance from the mth maximum to the centre, and m is the mth maximum.

Therefore:
[tex]x_{4} = (4 - 1) \times 6. \ast 10^{-3} m[/tex]
[tex]x_{4} = 2. \ast 10^{-2} m[/tex]

I feel like there is some terminology in there this in incorrect, even though I am using what two texts state. Maybe I am getting confused, but I would greatly appreciate to know if I did this correctly with the correct statements and terminology. Similarly, if I did not, I would equally appreciate knowing what I am doing wrong.

Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The central maximum is at x = 0 (origin). If the separation between maxima is λL/d, then the distance between the origin and the 1st maximum will be

x1=1*(λL/d)

The distance between the origin and the 2nd maximum will be

x2=2*(λL/d)

The distance between the origin and the 3rd maximum will be

x3=3*(λL/d)

So ...
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
The central maximum is at x = 0 (origin). If the separation between maxima is λL/d, then the distance between the origin and the 1st maximum will be

x1=1*(λL/d)

The distance between the origin and the 2nd maximum will be

x2=2*(λL/d)

The distance between the origin and the 3rd maximum will be

x3=3*(λL/d)

So ...

Okay, I think my confusion is cleared up now. I do believe I understand.

Thank you very much for your time and help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K