How Far Will a Sled Travel on Dry Ground After Sliding Down a Frictionless Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter r_swayze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a sled sliding down a frictionless hill and then traveling on dry ground with a specified coefficient of friction. The height of the hill is given as 50 m, and participants are exploring how to determine the distance the sled will travel after reaching the bottom.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin solving the problem, questioning the necessity of knowing the mass and angle of the hill for calculating velocity and distance.
  • Some participants suggest that mass and angle can be left as variables since they will cancel out in the equations.
  • Others discuss using potential and kinetic energy equations to relate the energies at the top and bottom of the hill.
  • There is a focus on the forces acting on the sled at the bottom of the hill and the role of friction in determining acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various approaches to understanding the energy transformations involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of energy equations and the cancellation of mass, but there is no explicit consensus on the final calculations or outcomes.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the accuracy of the calculated velocity at the bottom of the hill, with one participant suggesting a different value than what was initially presented. The conversation reflects an exploration of assumptions regarding energy conservation and the effects of friction.

r_swayze
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
When your sled starts down from the top of a hill, it hits a frictionless ice slick that extends all the way down the hill. At the bottom, the ground is dry and level. The effective coefficient of friction between the sled runners and the ground is 0.62. If the hill is 50 m high, how far will your sled travel once it reaches the bottom?

How do I solve this problem? I have no clue where to begin, because I thought you would need to know at least the mass and angle of the hill to figure out the velocity and then the distance. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could leave m and A in your work and they will cancel out, so the same answer regardless of the mass and the angle of the hill. It is probably quicker to get the answer using
PE at top = KE at bottom
Fill in the detailed formulas for those energies and you'll see the m's cancel out right away.
 
Ok, so what you have to do is use the equations:

Eg=mgh and Ek=1/2mv^2

You know that when the sled starts at the top of the hill there is no kinetic energy acting on the sled and at the bottom there is no gravitational potential energy acting on the sled. Since there is no friction, every object on this hill will end up at the same speed at the bottom of the hill.

So we can just make up a mass...

Let's say m=1.0 kg
We know the height of the hill is 50m
We know gravity is 9.8 N/kg

At the top of the hill Eg=Total Energy... At the bottom of the hill Ek=Total Energy.

Top of the hill:
Eg=(1)(9.8)(50)
= 490

Bottom of the hill:
Ek=1/2(1)(v^2)
490 = 0.5(v^2)
v=33.305 m/s

Because 1 Joule equals a Newton x metre... (Newton x metre)/kg = m^2/s^2

Now you know the initial speed when it reaches the bottom of the hill. If you draw an FBD of the sled at the bottom of the hill you will notice there are only 3 forces acting on it. Fg and Fn, which obviously cancel out because there is no angle, and Ff... **Remember** You cannot use the mass from the first step for this step.

Now Ff=∑F, so you can calculate acceleration. We know ∑F=ma, Fn=Fg=mg, μ=Ff/Fn and μ=0.62. Now you can make up the equations that will cancel mass out in the end.

∑F=Ff=ma
Fn=Fg=mg
μ=0.62
g=9.8 N/kg

We can say that:
μ=Ff/Fn
μ=ma/mg
0.62(m)(9.8) = ma
a=(0.62)(9.8)
= 6.076 m/s^2 [backwards]

With the acceleration you now have V1=33.305 m/s, V2=0 m/s and the acceleration which you previously calculated. You can now use your normal motion equations (the one without time) to calculate the distance.

Hope this helps...
 
Last edited:
Shootingrubbe:

That's nearly flawless. Thanks for the help. I believe the velocity at the ground (y=0m) should actually 31.305m/s. Using the equation V^2=Vo^2+2a(X) We know that Vo is zero.

V^2= 2(9.8)(50m)
V^2= (19.6)(50)
V^2= 980
V= SQRT(980) = 31.3049m/s

Using V1=31.305 in the final equation: V^2=Vo^2+2a(X) gives the correct answer.

Cheers,
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K