- 42,842
- 10,509
I get slightly less, but that should be close enough. Maybe you used a larger value for g.DeepPatel said:I had added 880J and I think I had to subtract. If I fixed the errors I now got an answer of 20.549 m/s
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a man sledding down a hill, where participants explore concepts related to work, energy, and friction. The problem includes calculating the work done by friction and determining the final velocity at the bottom of the hill, incorporating principles of mechanical energy conservation.
The conversation is active, with participants sharing calculations and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definitions of work and the implications of negative work done by friction, but no consensus has been reached on the final velocity calculations.
Participants note the use of simplified gravitational acceleration values for calculations, which may affect the outcomes. There is also an emphasis on ensuring that the physical implications of the equations used are considered, particularly regarding the contributions of friction.
I get slightly less, but that should be close enough. Maybe you used a larger value for g.DeepPatel said:I had added 880J and I think I had to subtract. If I fixed the errors I now got an answer of 20.549 m/s
Yeah our teacher prefers we use 10 m/s2 instead of 9.81m/s2 to save us time and make it easier.haruspex said:I get slightly less, but that should be close enough. Maybe you used a larger value for g.