How fast do I have to go to get away from an explosion in space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rben13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the scenario of a spacecraft being impacted by a large asteroid and the subsequent explosion that could occur due to the hydrogen and oxygen tanks onboard. Participants explore the necessary speed and distance for a smaller spacecraft to escape the blast wave from the explosion, considering various assumptions and calculations related to the physics of the situation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines a scenario involving a kilometer-long spacecraft loaded with hydrogen and oxygen tanks, hit by a nickel-iron asteroid, and seeks to determine the lead time and speed required for a smaller spacecraft to avoid the explosion.
  • Another participant provides calculations based on assumptions about the explosion, including the total mass of gases involved and the energy released, estimating the speed of the blast wave to be around 1-5 km/s.
  • Concerns are raised about the initial velocity of the asteroid, with some participants suggesting that the assumed speed of 60 m/s is too low, proposing instead that typical impact velocities could be around 10 km/s or higher.
  • There is a discussion about the distance required for the escaping spacecraft to be safe from the explosion, with estimates suggesting it should be around 100 km away to avoid the blast wave.
  • One participant mentions that the heat and sparks from the impact could trigger an explosion, indicating that the asteroid does not necessarily need to pass through Earth's atmosphere to cause significant damage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the initial velocity of the asteroid, with no consensus reached on the appropriate speed. While some calculations and assumptions are presented, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact parameters needed for the escaping spacecraft.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the energy of the explosion, the density of the gases, and the effects of the blast wave are not universally accepted and may vary among participants. The calculations rely on specific conditions that may not be applicable in all scenarios.

rben13
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm a science fiction writer, as yet unpublished. I really like to try to get as much of the science right as I can.

I'm working on a story in which an asteroid hits a kilometer long spacecraft that is loaded up with 130 30m long 10m diameter tanks. They hold hydrogen and oxygen (in separate tanks, of course). The ship is hit by a nickel-iron asteroid that's also about a kilometer across and quite hot. (It went through the upper part of Earth's atmosphere, leaving a nice trail of fire, before exiting back out into space.)

If I have a smaller spacecraft nearby, how much lead time does it need, and how fast does it need to go, to avoid being blown up?

This all happens about 36,000km from Earth. How much lead time would I need for my smaller ship to dive towards Earth and get around back behind it before debris could reach it?

Finally, any idea how much velocity a kilometer-wide asteroid would lose if it went through the atmosphere as I've described? Currently, I'm assuming the asteroid hits the atmosphere with a velocity of about 60 meters per second, gets to within 8k meters of the surface, and exits with a velocity of about 18 meters per second.

Any help with these questions and how to figure the answers would be greatly appreciated.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hello rben13, that’s a fun question. Calculating something like that requires you to assume lots of things though. Here’s a list of (some of) my assumptions:

1) All of the oxygen and hydrogen are used up in the chemical reaction explode.
2) The part of the blast wave moving towards the ship is not “used up” to explode the asteroid or much of the ship. Instead it will just be carrying the water formed from the combination of oxygen and hydrogen
3) The density contained in the cylindrical tanks is that of water (1 gram per cc).
4) All the energy of the explosion is converted into the kinetic energy of the blast wave

Here’s a sketch of my calculations for the chemistry and physics people.

Chemistry stuff:
According to my calculations (I love *saying* that), there is a total of 3 \times 10^8 kg of oxygen and hydrogen (with 2 hydrogen atoms for every 1 oxygen atom). This gives 2 \times 10^{34} atoms of hydrogen. If 118 kcal are released for every 4 moles of hydrogen, our explosion has an energy of about 4 \times 10^{15} J.

Physics stuff:
Here you need http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blast_wave" to tell you the velocity of the ejecta. This sort of analysis is routinely used to analyze supernova remnants and atomic bomb blasts. What happens is the ejecta expands freely (at constant velocity) until the mass the blast wave has swept up equals the original mass from the original explosion. For simplicity’s sake I’m going to forgo the taylor-sedov stuff and just assume the ejecta is moving along at constant velocity. Here’s the energy equation:

E=\frac{1}{2}m v^2

E is the energy of the explosion, m is the mass of the stuff (in our case mostly hydrogen and oxygen) and v is the speed of the ejecta (that the spaceship has to escape from). So…

v=\sqrt{\frac{2 E}{m}}= 1-5km/s

I’v done these calculations really fast, so feel free to correct the numbers or the physics. Spacecraft shouldn’t have any trouble reaching 5 km/s, but I’m not sure how long they need to attain a few kilometers per second from a standstill. Guestimating, I would assume the craft would need about 15-30 seconds to react and accelerate to top speed (I’m limiting acceleration to human constraints, not engineering ones). This means the escape craft has to be about 100 km away from the explosion to escape the blast wave.

Of course, what happens if the craft is engulfed? At some point the blast wave will be so wimpy the other craft will be able to withstand the explosion. The amount of energy the craft will absorb follows the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_square_law" . If we say the spacecraft can withstand about 5000 Joules per square meter (that’s kinetic energy of a 1 kg ball thrown at 100 m/s hitting a 1 square meter of spacecraft ) then once it is about 200-300 km away it will be safe (it would take about a minute for the craft to reach this distance).

Summary:
Speed of blast wave: 5 km/s

Necessary distance between explosion and escaping spacecraft : 100km-ish (the spacecraft should be able to attain a speed of 5 km/s easily so it just needs enough time to reach the speed of 5 km/s and then it doesn’t need to hide behind Earth)

(If this explosion isn't exciting enough for you, you can always make it more powerful by saying it's a nuclear explosion)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Isn't the assumption about asteroid velocity very low? I thought a speed more like 50km a second was likely. Or 1000 times as large as the OP's figure.
 
rogermunns said:
Isn't the assumption about asteroid velocity very low? I thought a speed more like 50km a second was likely. Or 1000 times as large as the OP's figure.

50 km/s is on the high end, but 60 m/s is certainly much too low. A typical speed for an impactor is 10 km/s. In geosynchronous orbit, the spacecraft 's orbital speed is only
460 m/s, so the asteroid is likely to zip right through the cargo ship before it has time to heat up the ship's contents. That's OK, though; the heat and sparks created by such a violent impact should be enough to set off an explosion. So you don't really need the asteroid to pass through Earth's atmosphere first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
9K