How fast does a human sized object need to move so I won’t see it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gen66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the speed at which a human-sized object would need to move to be undetectable by the human eye, particularly in the context of fictional representations like the Flash. Participants explore various factors influencing visibility, including speed, viewing angle, and environmental conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether Mach 2 speed (2469 km per hour) would be sufficient for a human-sized object to be completely unseen when passing nearby.
  • Another participant suggests that the Flash's speed is a narrative device rather than a reflection of physical reality, indicating that fictional characters often operate outside coherent physical laws.
  • Some participants mention the potential impact of a supersonic shock wave, which could draw attention regardless of the object's speed.
  • Visibility is influenced by factors such as viewing angle, light conditions, and the observer's concentration, with one participant noting that they sometimes fail to notice people at normal walking speeds.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the angle at which one views the object affects how long it remains in the field of view and its perceived speed, suggesting that this is more about human perception than physics alone.
  • Another participant argues that the question is fundamentally about speed and not biology, expressing frustration over the lack of numerical answers.
  • There are references to subliminal cuts in movies, indicating that brief visibility may not be processed by the brain, but this does not provide a specific speed requirement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of biological factors in determining visibility, with some insisting that the question is purely about speed while others argue that human perception plays a significant role. Overall, the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the factors affecting visibility.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific numerical answers regarding the necessary speed for undetectability and the dependence on various subjective factors like concentration and environmental conditions.

gen66
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Summary:: How fast does a human sized object(or a human) need move so I won’t be able to see it at all if it passes right next to me?

Im trying to figure out something in regards to the Flash movies/Flash series but I’m super bad at calculations and math :(
Do you think that mach 2 speed(2469km per hour) is enough for me to not see at all a human sized object passing right next to me?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
The Flash travels at the speed of plot, I'm afraid. He, along with many fictional characters, exists in a universe that does not have a coherent physical law because the writers don't have a coherent physical model in mind when writing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
I thought the question was about the Flash video format.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Barry Z, BillTre and russ_watters
gen66 said:
Do you think that mach 2 speed(2469km per hour) is enough for me to not see at all a human sized object passing right next to me?
What about the supersonic shock wave? That might get your attention. As previously mentioned, fantasy is fantasy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27, BillTre and pinball1970
gen66 said:
Do you think that mach 2 speed(2469km per hour) is enough for me to not see at all a human sized object passing right next to me?
That should work, since you will be knocked unconscious by the shock wave, so you won't be seeing anything until you (hopefully) wake up in the ICU...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, pinball1970, phinds and 2 others
beat you...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and berkeman
Ah, still no serious answer :( Ok, please ignore the shockwave the object will create and let's focus only on visibility, how fast it would need to move to be undetectable by humans eyes, e.g. distance 1 to 10 meters away from the eyes.
 
gen66 said:
Do you think that mach 2 speed(2469km per hour) is enough for me to not see at all a human sized object passing right next to me?
Depends the viewing angle, light conditions, and your concentration. I sometimes don't notice people passing me at normal walking speeds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
A.T. said:
Depends the viewing angle, light conditions, and your concentration. I sometimes don't notice people passing me at normal walking speeds.
If I give you all these, would you try to answer the question or you would just ask for more specific details and variables?
Just a normal viewing angle right in front of you, at eye height or a little bit lower. Light is bright day at 13pm, no clouds. Concentration level is medium, you're just gazing in front of you, it's enough concentration to see an incoming fly/insect in proximity.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
gen66 said:
Just a normal viewing angle right in front of you, ...
The key is: Are you looking exactly perpendicular to the object's path, or at some oblique angle? That affects how long the object stays in your field of view, and its angular speed across your field of view. This is more a biology question about human perception limits, rather than about physics.
 
  • #11
gen66 said:
Ah, still no serious answer :( Ok, please ignore the shockwave the object will create and let's focus only on visibility, how fast it would need to move to be undetectable by humans eyes, e.g. distance 1 to 10 meters away from the eyes.
You may see it but your brain would probably be unable to process the data.
Subliminal cuts in movies are in front of your eyes for a fraction of a second but tend not to notice them.
 
  • #12
A.T. said:
The key is: Are you looking exactly perpendicular to the object's path, or at some oblique angle? That affects how long the object stays in your field of view, and its angular speed across your field of view. This is more a biology question about human perception limits, rather than about physics.
It's perpendicular, question is about physics, it's definitely not a biology question. I'm asking about speed, the answer contains speed, where is the biology in speed? No matter what information you get, you just won't answer the question. Just say it's a difficult one and you don't know and that's it.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and BillTre
  • #13
pinball1970 said:
You may see it but your brain would probably be unable to process the data.
Subliminal cuts in movies are in front of your eyes for a fraction of a second but tend not to notice them.
thank you for the answer. It doesn't contain any numbers unfortunately. Question was about the necessary speed needed.
 
  • #14
47
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and russ_watters
  • #15
hutchphd said:
47
aha, if there were less trolls around these forums It would be amazing :)
 
  • #16
This answer has the same level of specificity as the question. You asked for a meaningless number, and I gave you one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and berkeman
  • #17
gen66 said:
it's definitely not a biology question.
You are asking what a human can see. This is determined by human biology.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #18
gen66 said:
aha, if there were less trolls around these forums It would be amazing :)
There's an old saying, "It takes one to know one."

Thread is done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander and hutchphd

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
26K