A convincing way to reason inverse square law (of classical EM and gravity) is a conservation of the field lines as one proceeds away from a source...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/forces/isq.html

It appears as a reasonable and intuitive thing to expect... but, it does NOT seem to hold for weak forces. So, how to convince ourselves of this violation in weak interactions, in a classical sense? (I know it comes about 'naturally' in QFT, but I want a classical/intuitive reason).

As for the strong nuclear force, can we say the reason it does NOT obey inverse square law has got to do with the mass of the gluons and the strong gluon-gluon interaction? As in, can these negate any expectation of a conservation of (classical) 'field lines'?

PS: If I have not made myself clear, let me know... I will rephrase.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How fundamental is inverse square law?

Loading...

Similar Threads - fundamental inverse square | Date |
---|---|

A Fundamental Theorem of Quantum Measurements | Jan 24, 2018 |

Insights The Fundamental Difference in Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics - Comments | Jan 9, 2018 |

I Does 'Phase Inversion' grow exponentially? | Dec 13, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**