How High Does a Rocket Go If Its Engine Cuts Off at 500 Meters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CollegeStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Altitude Maximum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of a rocket fired vertically with an initial upward acceleration. The rocket's engine cuts off at an altitude of 500 meters, and participants are exploring how to determine the maximum altitude the rocket achieves after the engine stops.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating the final velocity of the rocket at 500 meters and the time taken to reach that altitude. There is an exploration of how to incorporate gravitational acceleration after the engine cuts off and how to find the additional height gained during free fall.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on arithmetic corrections and have pointed out minor mistakes in calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants questioning their assumptions and discussing the implications of significant figures on their results.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the final altitude and acknowledge potential errors in their calculations. There is mention of the challenge of transitioning from high school to college-level physics, which may influence their confidence and approach to problem-solving.

CollegeStudent
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket, initially at rest, is fired vertically with an upward aceleration of 10m/s². At an altitude of .50 km, the engine of the rocket cuts off. What is the maximum altitude it achieves?

Homework Equations


V² = V_o² + 2aΔx
t = (V-V_o)/a

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I wanted to find the Final Velocity at the .50km first so

V² = V_o² + 2aΔx
V² = 0² + 2(10)(500m) *Converted .50km to m
V² = 10000
V = 100m/s

Since that final velocity

t = (V-V_o)/a
t = (100 - 0) / 10
t = 10seconds

So it takes 10 seconds to travel the 500m

But now I'm stuck...I see that to find the final altitude:

The X_o is now 500m
The V_o is now 100m/s

I believe that gravity -9.81m/s/s would become the new acceleration?

I'm not sure how to find out how much longer it will be in the air until it starts going down and I'm not sure how to find the final altitude.

Is this correct to this point?

EDIT: Actually the V would be 0m/s wouldn't it? I forgot that.

Now shouldn't I be able to

V = V_o + at
t = (0-100)/(-9.81)
t = 10.19367992 seconds remaining in the air so

X = V_o t + X_o + 1/2 a t²
X = 100(10.19367992) + 500 + (1/2)(-9.81)(10.19367992)²
X = 101.9367992 + 500 + (-509.6839961)
X = 92.2528031 m more than 500

So 592.2528031m

or

.59 km? No that can't be right...Okay now any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're very close. I think you just made a very simple arithmetic mistake: 100(10.19367992) ≠ 101.9367992
 
Melon Knight said:
You're very close. I think you just made a very simple arithmetic mistake: 100(10.19367992) ≠ 101.9367992

Ahh, didn't even notice that
Okay

X = V_o t + X_o + 1/2 a t²
X = 100(10.19367992) + 500 + (1/2)(-9.81)(10.19367992)²
X = 1019.367992 + 500 + (-509.6839961)
X = 1009.683996 m more than 500

So now

1009.683996 + 500 = 1509.683996m

Answer in km would be 1509.683996m / 1000 = 1.509684 km?

Look correct now?

Odd because I see the answer would be 1.0km

But I'm sure somewhere along the way there was another minor problem...like not carrying over a significant figure or something
 
CollegeStudent said:
X = 1019.367992 + 500 + (-509.6839961)
X = 1009.683996 m more than 500

Again, very close ;) You already added the 500 m from when the engine cut off so your final answer would be 1009 m ≈ 1.0 km.
 
Melon Knight said:
Again, very close ;) You already added the 500 m from when the engine cut off so your final answer would be 1009 m ≈ 1.0 km.

Oh ARGH! I hate making those kinds of mistakes! haha Thank you Melon...I really need to get back in the physics mindframe. Did awesome taking AP classes in high school but now that I'm in college it's like I can't get used to it again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K