How high does the ball rise on the non-slip surface?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the height a solid ball rises after being released from a height of 88.1 cm on a non-slip surface. The ball's radius is 9.7 cm, and the moment of inertia is calculated using the formula I=2/5mr². The conservation of energy principle is applied, leading to the conclusion that the ball reaches a height of approximately 0.629 m after rolling. An alternative approach suggests that for a rolling solid ball, 5/7 of the kinetic energy is linear, indicating the new height is 5/7 of the original height.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its relationship to linear velocity
  • Basic proficiency in solving physics equations involving rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about the moment of inertia for different shapes and its applications
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity in rolling motion
  • Investigate the effects of friction on rolling objects in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation in rolling motion scenarios.

annao
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid ball with radius of 9.7 cm is released from the height of hs=88.1 cm on a non-slip surface. After reaching its lowest point the ball begins to rise again, on a frictionless surface. How high does the ball rise on that side? Express your answer in cm.

Homework Equations


I=2/5mr^2
Law of conservation of energy: 1/2mv^2 +1/2Iω^2 +mgh=1/2mv^2 +1/2Iω^2 +mgh
ω=sqrt(2mgh/(mr^2+I))
h'=v^2/2g=(rω)^2/2g

The Attempt at a Solution


r=9.7cm =9.7*10^-2m
hs=88.1 cm =0.881m

moment of inertia of ball: I=2/5 mr^2

Law of conservation of energy: 1/2mv^2 +1/2Iω^2 +mgh=1/2mv^2 +1/2Iω^2 +mgh
...
1/2mr^2ω^2 +1/2Iω^2 =mgh

ω=sqrt(2mgh/(mr^2+I))
= sqrt (2mgh/ (mr^2 +2/5mr^2))
= sqrt (2mgh/ mr^2(1+2/5))
= sqrt (2gh/ r^2(1+2/5)

= sqrt(2*9.81m/s^2*0.881m) / (9.7*10^-2m)^2* (1+2/5))
=36.22444194rad/s

h' =v^2/2g
=(rω)^2/2g
=( 9.7*10^-2m*36.22444194rad/s)^2/(2*9.81m/s^2)
=0.6292857143m

Am I doing this problem correctly?
 

Attachments

  • non_slip_fric.png
    non_slip_fric.png
    41.7 KB · Views: 561
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks okay.

I would probably have let ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}## and solved for ##v^2## at the bottom. Then the conservation of energy for the upslope journey would be pretty trivial.
 
annao said:
0.6292857143m
Too many digits, given the initial height is only specified to three digits.
Quickest way is probably to show (or remember) that for a rolling solid ball 5/7 of the KE is linear. So the new height must be 5/7 of the original height.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K