How important is taking physics lab?

  • Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date
  • #1
2,255
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Do you think it is important to take a physics lab subject for a whole semester if I am focusing on the theoretical side? Or would it be more beneficial to skip the lab and do more theory subjects in order to get a better grounding of the thory?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,414
5
I think its important to have a good idea of how experimental physics is done, even if you're doing theoretical.
 
  • #3
Dr Transport
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,390
519
You'll learn more about physics by doing in the lab than calculating on paper. Everyone should have time in the lab, no exceptions.....
 
  • #4
2,255
1
Dr Transport said:
You'll learn more about physics by doing in the lab than calculating on paper. Everyone should have time in the lab, no exceptions.....
Even for a mathematical physicist?
 
  • #5
500
0
pivoxa15 said:
Even for a mathematical physicist?
Of course!
 
  • #6
Dr Transport
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,390
519
Every physicist, theoretical, computational, mathematical etc....should have at a minuimum of one year of lab courses/experience at the undergrad AND graduate level. If you don't you have been severely cheated out of an important portion of your training as a physicist.

Even a theoretican has to be able to talk to and interact with experimental physicists and an important part of that interaction is having a rudimentary knowledge of lab techniques. My PhD advisor has told me that I have become a much better and more rounded physicist since I started interacting on a daily basis with my counterparts in the labs I deal with, matter a fact I spent a good part of this week in the lab working on learning to take data which is very important to the sucess of a program I am working on. How many theoreticians can say that they played an important part in the design, build, test and calibration of a measurement apparatus down to the choice of rotation stages and lock-in amplifier choice along with the specification of the detector systems. I spent time learning to program LabView to help in the control of the data aquisition, there wasn't a theoretician on the faculty at my university who could say that.
 
  • #7
2,255
1
Dr Transport said:
Every physicist, theoretical, computational, mathematical etc....should have at a minuimum of one year of lab courses/experience at the undergrad AND graduate level. If you don't you have been severely cheated out of an important portion of your training as a physicist.

Even a theoretican has to be able to talk to and interact with experimental physicists and an important part of that interaction is having a rudimentary knowledge of lab techniques. My PhD advisor has told me that I have become a much better and more rounded physicist since I started interacting on a daily basis with my counterparts in the labs I deal with, matter a fact I spent a good part of this week in the lab working on learning to take data which is very important to the sucess of a program I am working on. How many theoreticians can say that they played an important part in the design, build, test and calibration of a measurement apparatus down to the choice of rotation stages and lock-in amplifier choice along with the specification of the detector systems. I spent time learning to program LabView to help in the control of the data aquisition, there wasn't a theoretician on the faculty at my university who could say that.
Very convincing. They also labeled this lab subject as a core subject so I should take it instead of doing extra theory.
 
  • #8
124
0
i agree with all the previous statements ,being able to do lab is very important when it comes to science ......
 

Related Threads on How important is taking physics lab?

  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
19K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top