How is converted the energy of a E.M. wave in a conductor

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
How is converted the energy of a E.M. wave in a conductor
Relevant Equations
##u_i = u_e + u_m##
I'm thinking about how the energy is conserved when a E.M. wave pass through a conductor.
If a E.M. pass through a conductor, the electrons must move "oscillated", thus the energy from the E.M. wave is converted to kinematic energy.
Another way I see that is the E.M wave must generate a current.
I don't know if my intuition is correct, but either way, I can't prove the conservation of energy. The initial energy ##u_i = u_e + u_m \neq u_f + \frac{1}{2}mv^2##
I must forget something or it's not as simple as that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field of the wave creates a voltage along the wire. This then creates a current in the wire dictated by the resistances and reactances which are present. (Notice that a piece of wire has its own distributed L and C even without adding anything to make a circuit). When the current flows, it means that electrons have been accelerated, and when they do this they radiate. For a wire having no resistance, any energy which is intercepted will be re-radiated due to electron acceleration. For a wire in a circuit with resistance, some of the energy intercepted will be re-radiated, the remainder warming the resistor.
The electrons have very small mass, so KE is negligible, but when they move they create a magnetic field, and this stores energy as if it were a mass. This gives inertia, as if we had mass.
The inertia means that the acceleration of the electrons in response to an incoming wave may be delayed, in a similar way to current in an inductor. Phase shift also arises due to capacitance in the circuit. The re-radiated wave will combine with the incoming wave causing it to be weaker due to the intercepted energy. However, if the re-radiated energy is shifted in phase, the passing EM wave can exhibit effects such as a shadow, or a bright reflection.
Notice that the physical length, shape and components of the circuit will, in a complex way, influence the power which is intercepted.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top