How is equation 4.61 derived from n dot s in the Arbitrary Spin Operator?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivation of equation 4.61 from the expression n dot s involves the use of the radial versor n, defined as (sin(theta) cos(phi), sin(theta) sin(phi), cos(theta)), and the Pauli matrices (σx, σy, σz). The components of the spin operator S are represented as the Pauli matrices multiplied by ħ/2, as outlined in equation 4.55. The confusion arose from mixing up table 4.60 with the Pauli matrices, leading to a clarification of the operator's notation from lower case 's' to upper case 'S'.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically spin operators.
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their representation in three-dimensional space.
  • Basic grasp of matrix operations and linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the spin operator in quantum mechanics, focusing on the Pauli matrices.
  • Explore the application of spherical coordinates in quantum mechanics, particularly in spin systems.
  • Review the definitions and properties of the radial versor in three-dimensional space.
  • Investigate the significance of ħ (reduced Planck's constant) in quantum mechanics and its role in spin calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with spin systems, and anyone seeking to understand the mathematical foundations of spin operators.

nateHI
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
http://www.tampa.phys.ucl.ac.uk/~tania/QM4226/SEC4B.pdf

At the above link, I'm not quite sure how the instructor got to the matrix definition for Sn(equation 4.61 on page 4) from n dot s. Does someone know of a link that doesn't skip that step?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nateHI said:
At the above link, I'm not quite sure how the instructor got to the matrix definition for Sn(equation 4.61 on page 4) from n dot s. Does someone know of a link that doesn't skip that step?

Well, n = (sin(theta) cos(phi), sin(theta) sin(phi), cos(theta)) is the radial versor, and the Pauli matrices (sigmax, sigmay, sigmaz) are the usual ones... take the scalar product... what don't you understand exactly?
 
I'm not sure what the lower case s is, I think it should be upper case, i.e. the operator defined in eqn 4.52. The components of S are the pauli matrices times hbar/2 as in 4.55.
 
OK I get it. It was a silly mistake. I was getting table 4.60 mixed up with the pauli matrices. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K