How is exp(tL) rigorously defined in Duhamel's formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yugo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the rigorous definition of the operator exponential exp(tL) in the context of Duhamel's formula, particularly for semi-linear partial differential equations (PDEs). The operator L is identified as a differential operator, with the exponential defined via Taylor series expansion. The conversation highlights the application of this concept to the Laplacian operator, demonstrating that exp(tL) serves as the solution to the heat equation in Banach space. The participants clarify the use of Duhamel's formula to establish existence and uniqueness theorems for specific PDE problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential operators, specifically the Laplacian operator.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their application to operator exponentials.
  • Knowledge of semigroup theory in functional analysis.
  • Basic concepts of partial differential equations (PDEs) and their solutions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Duhamel's formula in solving semi-linear PDEs.
  • Learn about the properties of semigroups of operators, particularly in the context of Banach spaces.
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the heat equation solutions using the Laplacian operator.
  • Investigate fixed-point theorems and their relevance in proving existence and uniqueness for PDE solutions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with partial differential equations, particularly those interested in the application of operator theory and semigroup methods in solving PDEs.

Yugo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am having trouble understanding how to use Duhamel's formula as a contraction to give existence uniqueness theorems for certain semi linear PDE.
To be more precise, have a look at the PDE and corresponding Duhamel formula in the wikipedia link given below:

http://tosio.math.toronto.edu/wiki/index.php/Duhamel's_formula

How is the exp(tL) even rigorously, defined? I can't find this anywhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
L here is a differential operator. Exponentials of operators, like exponentials of matrices, are defined through the Taylor's series for ex:
e^L= I+ L+ \frac{1}{2}L^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
where the powers mean repeated application of the operator and "I" is the identity operator. Of course, that should be applied to some function:
e^L(f)= f+ L(f)+ \frac{1}{2}L^2(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
That is typically very difficult (or impossible) to evaluate for all but self-adjoint operators.
 
I see. So for example, that thing would make sense if the operator L was a Laplacian?

Moreover, if that's the case, could you possibly give me an example of using that Duhamel formula as a contraction to solve a PDE problem? I've seen this sort of thing before for PDEs like the one above with u being a function of two variables and L the corresponding (spatial) laplacian, but I didn't understand how to show that the duhamel formula has a fixed point iff the PDE problem had a solution.
 
HallsofIvy said:
L here is a differential operator. Exponentials of operators, like exponentials of matrices, are defined through the Taylor's series for ex:
e^L= I+ L+ \frac{1}{2}L^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
where the powers mean repeated application of the operator and "I" is the identity operator. Of course, that should be applied to some function:
e^L(f)= f+ L(f)+ \frac{1}{2}L^2(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
That is typically very difficult (or impossible) to evaluate for all but self-adjoint operators.

HallsofIvy, that is not difficult like you see! by semigroupe theory the expression e^{tL}f is the solution of the differential equation on Banach space : u'+Lu=0, u(0)=f, so for example for the laplacian,
e^{t\Delta}f is the solution of the Heat equation (for Dirichlet or Neumann conditions) which is the gaussian kernel:wink:
 
Thank you, I think I got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
21K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
54
Views
11K