How is high speed computer stock trading taxed?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the USA, organizations engaged in high-speed stock trading primarily incur short-term capital gains taxes due to the rapid turnover of their positions. These entities can opt for a tax method that allows them to calculate their annual profits by marking all positions to current market prices, treating the total as ordinary income. This approach simplifies accounting and minimizes tax inefficiencies, as most gains are realized by year-end. The distinction between short-term and long-term capital gains becomes largely irrelevant for these traders due to their trading strategies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of short-term and long-term capital gains tax rates
  • Familiarity with tax reporting methods for securities
  • Knowledge of portfolio valuation techniques
  • Basic principles of profit and loss calculation in trading
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the IRS guidelines on capital gains taxation for traders
  • Explore tax strategies for high-frequency trading firms
  • Learn about the mark-to-market accounting method for securities
  • Investigate the implications of trading turnover on tax liabilities
USEFUL FOR

Tax professionals, financial analysts, high-frequency traders, and anyone involved in the taxation of stock trading activities will benefit from this discussion.

Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
In the USA, ordinary citizens pay different tax rates for "long term capital gains" versus "short term capital gains". What rates do organizations that do high speed stock trading with computers pay? Are all their profits short term capital gains? Or do they establish themselves as businesses in way that the short-term versus long-term distinction is no longer relevant?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Stephen Tashi said:
Are all their profits short term capital gains?

Yes.

Stephen Tashi said:
Or do they establish themselves as businesses in way that the short-term versus long-term distinction is no longer relevant?

Income is profit minus losses. So they pay a tiny fraction of gains since it is largely offset by losses.
 
Rather than keeping track of the profit of each individual trade, there's a tax option where you just figure out how much money you made each year by marking all your positions to the current market prices and pay taxes on it as ordinary income without worrying about where it came from.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Rather than keeping track of the profit of each individual trade, there's a tax option where you just figure out how much money you made each year by marking all your positions to the current market prices and pay taxes on it as ordinary income without worrying about where it came from.
That doesn't make any sense. You have to have a cost basis so it most certainly matters "where it came from".
 
phinds said:
That doesn't make any sense. You have to have a cost basis so it most certainly matters "where it came from".

You don't really. Let's say on January 1st 2019 you have -$200, 1 share of aapl and 1 share of amzn,. Aapl is trading for 100 and amzn 800. Then the net value of your portfolio is 700 dollars.

Now on January 1st 2020 let's say you have 1200 dollars, 2 shares of aapl and are short 1 share of amzn. Aapl is trading for 150 and amzn 700. Not the net value of your portfolio is 800 dollars. So you made 100 dollars in profit, and pay taxes on that.

Again, this is just one option companies can choose for how to pay taxes. It basically means you pay short term capital gains taxes on everything, even on positions you haven't closed yet. But if all your gains are short term anyway, and you turnover your positions so fast that you have realized most of your gains already by the end of the year, the tax inefficiency is almost zero and the accounting simplicity is enormous.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K