How is ##\Phi \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}## decay possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter mPlummers
  • Start date
  • #1
12
1
I know that, for charge conjugation, ##C_{\Phi} = -1##, ##C_{K^{+}} = 0##, ##C_{K^{-}} = 0##, but ##C_{\Phi} \neq C_{K^{+}}C_{K^{-}}##. How ##C_{tot}## is conserved in this interaction?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
32
33
What do you mean with ##C_{K^{\pm}}=0##?
##K^{\pm}## is not an eigenstate of the charge conjugation operator.
 
  • #3
12
1
You're right, i've just noticed that. Does it mean i can't check for charge conjugation conservation in this process? If i'm asked to check if this process is forbidden or not, which are the quantum numbers to check? The process is hadronic, and these processes conserve charge conjugation, right?
 
  • #4
35,505
11,959
The hadronic interaction is invariant under charge conjugation, yes. If you replace particles with antiparticles in a possible process the process is still possible. If you replace particles with antiparticles here you get the same process again.
Check the quark flavors and the energy. If they work out the process will be possible in general. It can be very unlikely due to spin/angular momentum, something to check as well.
 
  • #5
32
33
Does it mean i can't check for charge conjugation conservation in this process?

A single charged kaon is not an eigenstate of the charge conjugation operator. But a ##K^+K^-## system is.
 

Related Threads on How is ##\Phi \rightarrow K^{+}K^{-}## decay possible?

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
912
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
279
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
995
Replies
11
Views
272
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
948
Top