How is R4 space represented geometrically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nothing000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
Understanding R4 space geometrically is challenging, as it cannot be visualized directly. One approach is to consider functions of three variables, where level surfaces represent points in space with the same function value. For example, the function f(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2 - z^2 creates various level surfaces based on different constant values. While these surfaces can be plotted in three-dimensional space, they do not truly represent four-dimensional space. Ultimately, level surfaces provide a theoretical method to conceptualize R4, but true visualization remains impossible.
Nothing000
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
I just can't picture it in my mind. Is it possible to have an idea what a 4 dimensional space actually looks like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a function of two variables, you can consider all the points in the domain at which the fuction has the same value to retrieve a family of curves.

Analogically, you can actually consider all the points in space at which a function f(x, y, z) of three variables has the same value. These points form a surface, in general. So, that could be a way.
 
What? I don't get how that would describe four dimensional space.
 
Okay, take, for example f(x,y,z) = x^2+y^2-z^2.
f(x,y,z) = -1 => -x^2-y^2+z^2 = 1 ;
f(x,y,z) = 0 => x^2+y^2=z^2 ;
f(x,y,z) = 1 => x^2+y^2-z^2=1 ;
...

Every of these three surfaces represents the set of points in space in which the function f has the same value, as stated before. These surfaces are called level surfaces. Theoretically, plot all the level surfaces, i.e. all surfaces f(x,y,z) = c (where c is in the codomain of f), and you have a mapping between every value c and it's coresponding surface z = z(x,y). So, you visualized* R^4 in R^3. :biggrin:

* Conclusion: of course you didn't, and of course you can't, but creating level surfaces is the only way to 'deal' with R^4.
 
I knew that. :wink:
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K