How Is the Arctan Derived in Relativistic Coulomb Scattering?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the arctan function in the context of relativistic Coulomb scattering as presented in Landau and Lifgarbagez's "Classical Theory of Fields." Specifically, the equation for the angle of deflection of a charged particle is found on page 102, in the solution to Problem 1. The user seeks clarification on the transition from arccos to arctan in the derivation, noting that the relationship between the sides of a right triangle leads to the tangent function. The conclusion emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the geometric interpretation of the scattering angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, particularly arctan and arccos
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics and scattering theory
  • Ability to interpret mathematical equations in a physical context
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of scattering angles in relativistic physics
  • Learn about the geometric interpretations of trigonometric functions
  • Explore the applications of Landau and Lifgarbagez's equations in modern physics
  • Investigate the relationship between impact parameters and deflection angles in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic scattering phenomena.

Trickster2004
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi. Landau and Lifgarbages give an equation describing the angle of deflection of a charged particle of a given initial velocity and impact parameter. It's given on page 102 of their Classical Theory of Fields, available here: http://books.google.com/books?id=QI...X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5#PPA102,M1. It's in the solution to Problem 1, at the bottom of the page.

I'm just curious where the equation in Problem 1 came from, in particular where the arctan came from. It's simple to solve 39.4 for the angle letting r-->infinity, but that gives an arccos, not an arctan. L-L just state that as the answer without working through it, as if it's obvious. Does anyone see how to derive it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have an equation of the form \cos\theta=\frac{a}{b}, then you can think of a being the adjacent side of a right triangle, b being the hypotenuse and hence \sqrt{b^2-a^2} as the opposite side \implies \tan\theta=\frac{\sqrt{b^2-a^2}}{a}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K