Trouble understanding a derivative used in Hermite curve reparameterization

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pcap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Derivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the reparameterization of a Hermite curve from the parametric vector function \(\vec{P}(t)\) to \(\vec{Q}(T)\), where \(T = at + b\). The key equation derived is \(\frac{d\textbf{Q}(T)}{dT} = \frac{d\textbf{P}(t)}{dt} \frac{dt}{dT}\), which utilizes the chain rule for differentiation. The user seeks clarification on how this derivative is established, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of the chain rule in the context of parametric curves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric vector functions
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic knowledge of Hermite curves
  • Ability to manipulate derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in parametric differentiation
  • Explore Hermite curve properties and their mathematical representations
  • Learn about reparameterization techniques in curve design
  • Review examples of derivatives in parametric equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer graphics developers, and anyone involved in curve modeling and animation who seeks to understand the intricacies of Hermite curve reparameterization.

pcap
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to understand how to reparameterize a Hermite curve described by the parametric vector function \vec{P}(t) to a curve described by \vec{Q}(T) where T = at + b. In particular, I am having trouble finding the derivative of the reparameterized curve.

We know T_i = at_{i} + b and T_j = at_j + b. We also know, \frac{dT}{dt} = a.

The http://books.google.com/books?id=m0...#v=onepage&q=hermite curve parameter&f=false" I am looking at arrives at the following equation:

\frac{d\textbf{Q}(T)}{dT} = \frac{d\textbf{P}(t)}{dt} \frac{dt}{dT}

I do not understand how they arrived at this derivative, so I would appreciate any insight into this.

My thinking is a bit foggy now, so hopefully some rest will help. At any rate, I can provide more clarification as needed. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks to me like it is just the chain rule!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K