How is the head-flow curve dependant on reynolds number

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the head-flow curve of a Stuart Turner Type 12 centrifugal pump and the Reynolds number at varying speeds of 70, 80, and 90 revolutions per minute (RPM). The head coefficient (Ch) is calculated using the formula Ch = gH/(Nd)^2, where g is the gravitational constant, H is the head, N is the rotational speed, and d is the impeller diameter. The results indicate that the head-flow curves for 70 and 80 RPM are nearly identical, while the curve for 90 RPM shows a decrease of approximately 0.06 on the head coefficient axis, suggesting a dependency on the Reynolds number.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centrifugal pump operation and characteristics
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts, particularly Reynolds number
  • Knowledge of dimensionless numbers in fluid mechanics
  • Ability to interpret and plot graphs of head vs. flow rate
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the significance of Reynolds number in fluid dynamics
  • Learn how to derive and interpret dimensionless plots in pump performance analysis
  • Explore the effects of impeller speed on pump efficiency and performance
  • Investigate the relationship between head coefficient and flow rate in centrifugal pumps
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid mechanics students, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of centrifugal pumps will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in pump performance and fluid dynamics principles.

dragioden
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i trying to figure out why the head-flow curve changes at the speeds of 90, 80 and 70 revs and was told that i might want to look into reynolds number for this as the head coefficient is somewhat dependent on this.

Homework Equations


Ch=gH/(Nd)^2
Cf=Q/Nd^3
pi=f(Q/Nd^3, re)

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to put yourself in our place trying to read this post. We have no idea what the geometry is, or where the flow connections are placed. How can we possibly help you, given the information you have provided?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Try to put yourself in our place trying to read this post. We have no idea what the geometry is, or where the flow connections are placed. How can we possibly help you, given the information you have provided?

Chet
upload_2015-3-21_15-8-44.png


this the diagram given for the experiment layout, the second pump has been isolated for it, a transparent rubber tubing carries the water from the pump through the control valve. This valve controls how much water is let through at a time to the weir channel. Just as the water is about to leave the weir channel it comes into contact with a weir plate where the water gets impeded and needs to push up to get through the triangular gap. Once it gets past the weir plate it enters the collecting tank where that water is collected until it isn’t needed anymore than the ball valve is turned to allow it to enter the sump tank. Finally the water is taken from the sump tank when the pump starts taking in water again.

when the Head-flow was plotted onto a graph for the 3 values of speed, the graph came out with the lines for 70 and 80 revs nearly identical and the 90 revs being down by roughly 0.06 on the head coefficient axis with same gradient as the other 2 lines.

the pump model is a stuart turner type 12 centrifugal pump.
the impeller diameter 0.056m
the water density=1000kg/m3
the water viscosity=1.13x10-3 Kg/ms
 
Last edited:
You are measuring a centrifugal pump characteristic, and making graphs of the head vs flow rate at different rotational speeds, correct? You are trying to develop a dimensionless plot. Ch is the dimensionless gravitational number, Cf is the dimensionless flow rate, and pi is the dimensionless pressure (how is it defined)? What is the definition of the head coefficient? Can you provide the graphs you are talking about?

Chet
 
the graph it attached below
as for the head coefficient in this case would be the dimensionless gravitational constant you mentioned. as the equation i had used to calculate the head coefficient was Ch=gH/(Nd)^2
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    59.5 KB · Views: 535
dragioden said:
the graph it attached below
as for the head coefficient in this case would be the dimensionless gravitational constant you mentioned. as the equation i had used to calculate the head coefficient was Ch=gH/(Nd)^2
OK. I've looked over your graph, and can see what you mean. First of all, do you think that the difference is that big a deal? If so, do you need to develop a parametric equation to fit all the data, or can you just show the results as Ch vs Cf with Re as a parameter? If it's just the latter, then all you need to do is change the labels on the curves from 70, 80, and 90 to the corresponding ##Re = \frac{\rho ND^2}{\mu}##.

Chet
 
i see, i don't really think its that big a deal i was just asked to explain find whether Ch was affected by the speed of the impeller and the one who asked me to do so (lecturer) suggested that i look into reynolds number if it did appear to have some change.
thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
25K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K