MHB How Is the Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean Determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CGuthrie91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Sampling
CGuthrie91
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. On this question I really have no idea how they got these answers so I just need someone to walk me through it step by step please

View attachment 42052. Part B on this question I don't know how to get the correct answer either

View attachment 4206
 

Attachments

  • Statistic question 1.PNG
    Statistic question 1.PNG
    6.5 KB · Views: 89
  • Statistic question 2.PNG
    Statistic question 2.PNG
    8.7 KB · Views: 77
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In your first problem, you're talking about the samping distribution of the mean. If the standard deviation of the population is known, you can use the normal distribution; that is,
$$\bar{x}\sim N\left(\mu,\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}\right),$$
where $\mu$ is as given, $\sigma$ is the population standard deviation (also given in this case), and $n$ is the sample size. As a side note: in most real-world applications, you don't know $\mu$ or $\sigma$. Not knowing the mean isn't such a big deal - just approximate with $\bar{x}$. But if you don't know $\sigma$, then you have to use the student-$t$ distributions instead of the normal distribution.

So, now that you know the sampling distribution, can you work out the rest of the problem?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top