How is the Series ε + 2 ε^2 + 3 ε^3 + … Equal to ε/(1- ε)^2?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jbowers9
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical series ε + 2 ε² + 3 ε³ + … and its equivalence to ε/(1 - ε)². Participants explore the derivation of this relationship, its implications, and the notation used in the context of statistical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the series g(ε) = Σ n ε e^(-nε/kT) and attempts to relate it to the geometric series to derive the expression ε + 2 ε² + 3 ε³ = ε/(1 - ε)².
  • Another participant questions the notation used and suggests clarifying the expression for f(ε) to ensure proper understanding of the series.
  • A later reply explains that the series can be derived by differentiating the geometric series and relates it to statistical mechanics, emphasizing the role of the exponential function.
  • One participant expresses confusion about whether ε is treated as a constant or if it is defined in terms of the series, indicating a need for clarification on the definitions used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical approach to derive the series but express uncertainty regarding the notation and definitions. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ε and its relationship to f(ε).

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of proper notation and definitions in understanding the series. There are unresolved questions about the treatment of ε and its connection to the exponential terms in the series.

jbowers9
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
What they said:

f(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

Write the following series in terms of f’(ε):

g(ε) = Σ n ε e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

Then use the geometric series results to show that g can be written in the form:

ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2

What I did:

Let x = e-nε/kT

1/(1- x) = 1 + x + x2 + ...

1/(1- x)2 = 1 + 2x + 3x2 + 4x3 + ...

x/(1- x)2 = x + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 +...

which leads me to:

g(ε) = ε e-nε/kT / (1 - e-nε/kT)2 n = 0 to ∞

How do they get, ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2

and what does it mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand your notation, please use proper parantheses.

Do you mean:

f(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

[tex]f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-\frac{n \epsilon}{kT}[/tex]

OR

[tex]f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-n \epsilon}}{kT}[/tex]

And what is your question?

Is it why does this hold:

[tex]\epsilon + 2 \epsilon^{2} + 3 \epsilon^{3} = \frac{\epsilon}{\left(1 - \epsilon \right)^2}[/tex]

If so, that's just taking derivative of both sides. If you need more clarification, let me know
 
NoMoreExams said:
I'm not sure I understand your notation, please use proper parantheses.

Do you mean:

f(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

[tex]f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-\frac{n \epsilon}{kT}[/tex]

OR

[tex]f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-n \epsilon}}{kT}[/tex]

And what is your question?

Is it why does this hold:

[tex]\epsilon + 2 \epsilon^{2} + 3 \epsilon^{3} = \frac{\epsilon}{\left(1 - \epsilon \right)^2}[/tex]

If so, that's just taking derivative of both sides. If you need more clarification, let me know


The sum is the first one. The factor kT pegs this as a statistical mechanices problem.

Basically, to the OP, what the problem amounts to is that you have an infinite sum,

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\exp\left[-\frac{n\varepsilon}{k_BT}\right][/tex]

which is really just a geometric series: if you let [itex]x = \exp<br /> \left[-\frac{\varepsilon}{k_BT}\right][/itex], you get

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n = \frac{1}{1-x}[/tex]

(since the exponential is always less than one). Hence, if you take a derivative with respect to [itex]\beta = 1/(k_BT)[/itex] you get

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n \varepsilon e^{-n \varepsilon \beta} = -\frac{\varepsilon e^{-\varepsilon \beta}}{(1-e^{-\varepsilon \beta})^2}[/tex]

which allows you to easily find the average energy of the system.

Or, even simpler, leaving it as x and differentiating with respect to that,

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} nx^{n-1} = \frac{1}{(1-x)^2}[/tex]

so just multiply by [itex]\varepsilon e^{-\varepsilon \beta}[/itex] to get

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n \varepsilon x^n = \frac{\varepsilon x}{(1-x)^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
And what is your question?

Is it why does this hold:

ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2


If so, that's just taking derivative of both sides. If you need more clarification, let me know

How do they get, ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2

and what does it mean?

I understand how to proceed to get the expression

g(ε) = ε e-nε/kT / (1 - e-nε/kT)2 n = 0 to ∞

but epsilon is a constant, hυ, not e-nε/kT. Do they mean that ε = f(ε) = e-nε/kT? That makes sense then.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K