How Is the Total Energy Inside a Cylindrical Wire Calculated?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total energy stored inside a cylindrical wire of radius r and length L carrying a current I can be calculated using the energy density formula from Griffiths: uem = εE²/2 + B²/2μ. The total energy is derived by integrating this energy density over the volume of the wire. Two approaches were discussed: one evaluates the magnetic field B at the surface (B(r) = k/r) and integrates to find Energy = (εE²/2 + B²/2μ)πr²L, while the other considers B as a function of x (B = kx/r²) and integrates in cylindrical coordinates. The correct method requires clarity on whether the evaluation is at the boundary or within the wire.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically energy density concepts.
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' equations for electromagnetic fields.
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and volume integration.
  • Basic principles of current-carrying conductors and magnetic fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" for detailed explanations of energy density.
  • Learn about cylindrical coordinate integration techniques for electromagnetic applications.
  • Explore the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in current-carrying wires.
  • Investigate boundary conditions in electromagnetic field theory and their implications on energy calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone involved in electromagnetic theory or energy calculations in conductive materials.

Jesssa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Given a cylindrical wire of radius r, length L, carrying a current I, find the total energy stored inside the wire.

From griffiths,

uem= εE2/2 +B2/2μ

and the tot energy is

∫uem dVI have my E and B fields, but my B field is a function of x where x<r, (E is uniform)

B=kx/r2 (k=all the constants)

my question is,

it says inside the wire, does this mean i cannot put x=r and integrate easily to get

Energy=(εE2/2 +B2/2μ)[itex]\pi r^2 L[/itex] ?

will i have to integrate B separately to get something like

∫∫∫Kx x dx dz d[itex]\phi[/itex] where K = k/r2 (since dV = x dx dz dthi in cylindrical)

= (2/3) K x3 L pi

If so would this be it? No bounds on x, giving the energy at some radius inside the wire?

I guess the real question is, does saying INSIDE mean not evaluated at the boundary? Like the total energy inside the wire at any radius x<r

Im unsure about this because of the (2/3)x3 in the second approach since if you put x=r here it will be different to the first approach because of the (2/3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jesssa! :smile:
Jesssa said:
Given a cylindrical wire of radius r, length L, carrying a current I, find the total energy stored inside the wire.

I guess the real question is, does saying INSIDE mean not evaluated at the boundary? Like the total energy inside the wire at any radius x<r

The total energy stored inside the wire is the the energy per tiny volume, integrated over the whole volume. :wink:
 
hey tiny-tim,

the energy density is uem and the total energy is the integral of this over the whole volume, this is straight from griffiths, but I'm not sure about the solution to the problem,

do you know which of the two cases i posted are the correct approach?

the first is taking B at the surface B(r)=k/r = K

then the total energy is just what i posted in the first post,

(εE2/2 +B2/2μ)πr2L

and the second was leaving B as a function of x, the field at some distance x from the centre of the circular cross section,

B = kx/r2

integrating over the volume in cylindrical co-ordinates to get

∫∫∫Kx x dx dz dϕ where K = k/r2 (since dV = x dx dz dthi in cylindrical)

= (2/3) K x3 L pi i guess the question is over what volume is considered inside the cylinder, some x<a or just x=a?

or was your post implying that neither approaches are correct?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K