How long ago did the wooly mammoth disappear from North America?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chawkdee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining how long ago woolly mammoths disappeared from North America, based on the radiocarbon dating of their bones. The problem involves understanding radioactive decay and the half-life of carbon-14.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand whether to use a mathematical approach based on half-lives or to calculate the decay constant. Some participants suggest focusing on the ratio of current and original carbon-14 levels and estimating the number of half-lives needed to reach the observed percentage.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided hints and clarifications regarding the mathematical methods available for solving the problem. There is an acknowledgment that both methods discussed are valid and related, but no consensus has been reached on a preferred approach.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the mathematical processes involved, indicating a potential lack of familiarity with the concepts of radioactive decay and logarithmic calculations.

chawkdee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Bones of the wooly mammoth have been found in North America. The youngest of these bones has a 14C activity per gram of carbon that is about 21% of what was present in the live animal. How long ago (in years) did this animal disappear from North America?

I'm struggling with this problem - is it simply a mathematical problem - working out how many half-lives (5730 years) cause 21% to be left?
Or, do i have top work out the Decay constant λ then use ΔN/Δt = -λ N ?

If it is simply a mathematical Can anyone tell me how to do it please.
If I have to find the Decay constant, I'm still stumped on the mathematics involved.

Thanks for any help.

Chawkdee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just need the ratio of N_now, N_orig and the half life.
The equation is derived here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-life

c737eed649e864cc426cfc4c133bb49d.png


Hint, estimate how many half lives you would need to get 25% of the c14 left - it's easy to get logs the wrong way around in the calculator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, both methods are mathematical! There is no difference between them. The differential equation dN/dt = -λN has an exponentially decaying solution: N(t) = N0e-λt, where the constant N0 is the original amount.

You can easily express this as an exponential function having base 2 instead of base e. That will tell you the relation between the half-life and λ. That is how the two methods are related. That having been said, since you already know the half-life, you can probably use the first method you suggested.
 
Thanks a lot - great help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K