How long ago did the wooly mammoth disappear from North America?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chawkdee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The woolly mammoth disappeared from North America approximately 11,460 years ago, based on the analysis of radiocarbon dating of its bones. The youngest bones exhibit a 14C activity of 21% of the original amount, indicating that approximately two half-lives (5730 years each) have elapsed. The mathematical approach to solving this involves either calculating the number of half-lives or using the decay constant λ in the equation ΔN/Δt = -λN. Both methods yield the same result, confirming the relationship between half-life and exponential decay.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiocarbon dating principles
  • Familiarity with half-life calculations
  • Knowledge of exponential decay equations
  • Basic proficiency in logarithmic functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of radiocarbon dating and its applications
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of half-life equations
  • Explore the relationship between decay constant λ and half-life
  • Practice solving exponential decay problems using both methods
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in fields such as archaeology, geology, and environmental science, as well as anyone interested in understanding radiocarbon dating and exponential decay calculations.

chawkdee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Bones of the wooly mammoth have been found in North America. The youngest of these bones has a 14C activity per gram of carbon that is about 21% of what was present in the live animal. How long ago (in years) did this animal disappear from North America?

I'm struggling with this problem - is it simply a mathematical problem - working out how many half-lives (5730 years) cause 21% to be left?
Or, do i have top work out the Decay constant λ then use ΔN/Δt = -λ N ?

If it is simply a mathematical Can anyone tell me how to do it please.
If I have to find the Decay constant, I'm still stumped on the mathematics involved.

Thanks for any help.

Chawkdee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just need the ratio of N_now, N_orig and the half life.
The equation is derived here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-life

c737eed649e864cc426cfc4c133bb49d.png


Hint, estimate how many half lives you would need to get 25% of the c14 left - it's easy to get logs the wrong way around in the calculator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, both methods are mathematical! There is no difference between them. The differential equation dN/dt = -λN has an exponentially decaying solution: N(t) = N0e-λt, where the constant N0 is the original amount.

You can easily express this as an exponential function having base 2 instead of base e. That will tell you the relation between the half-life and λ. That is how the two methods are related. That having been said, since you already know the half-life, you can probably use the first method you suggested.
 
Thanks a lot - great help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K